was double than

USAGE SUMMARY

No, the phrase 'was double than' is not correct and is not usable in written English.
You can instead use 'was twice as much as', which is correct and is used to compare two things. For example, 'The cost of the project was twice as much as originally expected.'.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

The decrease in the length of guard hair (−43%) was double than that observed (−20%) in down leading to a closely similar length of both guard hair and down in rex rabbits.

Plosone

The proportion of patients carrying CNVs was double than that of controls (44% vs. 20%).

BMC Genomics

At the largest deviation, the predicted deviation was double than the observed accrual.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Furthermore, the enhancement ratio of formulation F4 was double than that of control indicating that the order of increasing permeation enhancement was F4>Glinate™ 60>control.

Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B

Upon ICU admission, PCT in patients with subsequent failure of initial treatment was double than in those with successful initial treatment, P = 0.04.

Critical Care

The frequency of the asymmetric deviations of posterior region occurring in the sagittal dimension was similar in the groups with spinal deformities and this value was double than the one registered in the CTRL group.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

The conductivity of the composite membrane was doubled than that of the host polymer membrane to a value of 0.111 S cm−1.

Electrochimica Acta

The period for 2005 to 2010 proves that remittance is double than the net income earned through the garment sector.

IZA Journal of Development and Migration

The number of buffers and multipliers required for (9, 7) filter is double than that for (5, 3).

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

The photodegradation rate of MO under the UV light exposure is 45.5 μmol (gh)−1 which is double than that of nanoparticle counterpart [103].

Nano-Micro Letters

In Nepal, male HIV-infected patients reported through HTC by July 2012 were double than female [ 25].

BMC Infectious Diseases

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "was double than" in formal writing. Use "was twice as much as" or "was double that of" instead to ensure grammatical correctness.

Common error

Many writers incorrectly use "double than" when they mean "twice as much as". Remember that "double" functions as a verb or adjective, so it needs proper grammatical structure to form a comparison.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was double than" attempts to express a quantitative comparison, indicating that one quantity is twice the size or amount of another. However, Ludwig AI confirms that this construction is grammatically incorrect, and should be replaced with a correct alternative.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

57%

News & Media

43%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "was double than" appears in a number of sources, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. The intended meaning is to express that one quantity is twice the size or amount of another. To ensure grammatical correctness, it's best to use alternatives such as "was twice as much as" or "was double that of". Usage contexts vary, but avoiding "was double than" in formal writing is recommended.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was twice as much as

Replaces "double than" with the grammatically correct "twice as much as".

was twice the amount of

Uses "twice the amount" instead of "double than", which is grammatically proper.

was two times greater than

Employs "two times greater" to convey the doubling effect.

was double the value of

Substitutes "double the value" for "double than", improving grammatical accuracy.

was twofold compared to

Uses "twofold" to indicate the doubling, offering a slightly more formal tone.

was twice the size of

Focuses on size comparison using "twice the size".

was double what it used to be

Uses "double what it used to be" to emphasize a prior state.

increased twofold from

Emphasizes the increase with the term "twofold" to convey the change from a starting point.

was duplicated compared to

Implies the multiplication of one value in relation to the other using "duplicated".

was multiplied by two relative to

Directly states the multiplication factor, providing a clear mathematical relationship.

FAQs

What's the correct way to say something is twice as big?

Instead of saying "was double than", use "was twice as much as" or "was double that of" for grammatical accuracy.

Is it ever okay to use "was double than"?

While you might encounter "was double than" in some informal contexts, it's generally considered grammatically incorrect. Sticking to alternatives like "was twice as much as" ensures clarity and correctness.

What's a more formal way to say something is double another quantity?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "was twofold compared to" or "was twice the amount of" instead of "was double than".

What are some common mistakes people make when trying to express that something has doubled?

A common mistake is using the phrase "was double than". The correct phrasing includes "was twice as much as", "was double that of", or similar constructions.