was divided into

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was divided into" is correct and commonly used in written English.
It is typically used to describe how something was separated or split into smaller parts. Example: The cake was divided into six equal slices. In this sentence, "was divided into" is used to show how the cake was cut into smaller pieces. Another example: The city was divided into different districts based on population. Here, "was divided into" is used to describe how the city was divided into smaller sections based on a specific criteria.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The memo was divided into four sections.

The New Yorker

The Sachsenspiegel was divided into two sections.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The drachma was divided into 100 lepta.

Encyclopedia Britannica

China was divided into some 40 prefectures.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The plane was divided into three compartments.

The New Yorker

The world was divided into zones.

The Economist

Connaught was divided into shires in 1576.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The exercise was divided into levels.

The New York Times - Magazine

The material was divided into sections.

The New York Times - Arts

The Administration was divided into three camps.

The New Yorker

So the company was divided into two.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was divided into" to clearly indicate how something is separated into distinct parts, ensuring the division is logical and easily understood by the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "was divided into" when simply describing different aspects of something without an actual separation occurring. Ensure a clear division or partitioning is present.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was divided into" functions as a passive construction, indicating how a subject has been separated or partitioned. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is a common way to describe the separation of a whole into distinct parts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

41%

News & Media

27%

Academia

11%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

7%

Wiki

7%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was divided into" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive verb phrase, as confirmed by Ludwig AI, employed to describe how something has been separated into distinct parts or categories. Its usage spans across various contexts, particularly in scientific, news, and academic writing. While its primary function is to provide clarity regarding structure and composition, it's important to ensure that the division is logical and clearly defined. Related alternatives include "was separated into" and "was split into". Remember to use "was divided into" only when a true separation is taking place to avoid misinterpretations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was separated into

Focuses on the act of separating an entity into distinct components.

was partitioned into

Emphasizes a more structured or formal division, often with clear boundaries.

was split into

Highlights the action of splitting an entity, often suggesting a more forceful separation.

was segmented into

Implies dividing something into distinct segments, often for analysis or targeted action.

was classified into

Focuses on categorizing items into different groups based on specific criteria.

was grouped into

Highlights the act of forming groups based on shared characteristics.

was broken down into

Implies a detailed analysis or decomposition into smaller, more manageable parts.

was allocated to

Emphasizes the assignment of portions to different recipients or purposes.

was apportioned among

Highlights the distribution of something proportionally among several entities.

was distributed across

Focuses on spreading elements over a given area or set of categories.

FAQs

How do I use "was divided into" in a sentence?

Use "was divided into" to describe how something has been separated into different parts or categories. For example, "The project was divided into three phases."

What can I say instead of "was divided into"?

You can use alternatives like "was separated into", "was split into", or "was partitioned into" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "was divided into" or "is divided into"?

"Was divided into" indicates a past action, while "is divided into" indicates a present state. Choose the appropriate tense based on whether the division has already occurred or is ongoing.

What's the difference between "was divided into" and "was divided by"?

"Was divided into" indicates separation into parts, while "was divided by" implies a mathematical operation or a separation caused by a divisor. For example, "The cake was divided into slices" versus "The class was divided by gender for the experiment."