was determined with

USAGE SUMMARY

"was determined with" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is often used to describe the process or method by which something was determined or found out. Example: The chemical composition of the substance was determined with the use of advanced spectroscopy techniques.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Protein concentration was determined with Roti-Nanoquant.

Nature

The content was determined with PLS regression.

Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis

Cell viability was determined with laser microscopy.

The Veterinary Journal

Cell concentration was determined with a Coulter Z2 particle analyser.

Nature

LC95 was determined with the susceptible reference strain Kisumu.

Nature

Statistical significance was determined with Student's t-test.

Nature

The composition was determined with 1H NMR.

Polymer

Statistical significance was determined with the χ2 test.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cell toxicity was determined with the trypan blue exclusion test.

Experimental Eye Research

Caspase 3 activity was determined with a microplate reader.

Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology

Coronary blood flow was determined with a Doppler flow probe.

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing in the active voice, consider restructuring sentences using "determined [something] with [method]" for a more direct tone.

Common error

Avoid overuse of the passive voice. While grammatically correct, phrases like "was determined with" can sometimes obscure who performed the action. If possible, rephrase in the active voice to highlight the actor: "Researchers determined the protein concentration with Roti-Nanoquant".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was determined with" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating the means or instrument used to ascertain something. It highlights the method employed rather than the actor, as shown in Ludwig examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was determined with" is a grammatically correct and very common passive construction, primarily used in scientific and academic writing. As Ludwig AI confirms, it serves to describe the process or method by which a finding was made. While acceptable, writers should be mindful of overusing the passive voice and consider active voice alternatives when appropriate. The phrase's formality makes it best suited for professional and technical contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was found using

A simpler way to express the means of discovery.

was identified by

Focuses on the process of recognizing or discovering.

was ascertained by

Replaces 'determined' with 'ascertained', implying a more careful and exact finding.

was measured via

Specifically indicates measurement as the method.

was calculated with

Specifically refers to determination through calculation.

was established through

Emphasizes the process of confirming or proving something.

was derived from

Indicates that something was obtained or deduced from something else.

was assessed by means of

More formal way of indicating the method of assessment.

was concluded based on

Highlights the basis for the final determination.

was figured out through

Informal way of saying something was discovered after some thought.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "was determined with" to be more active?

To use the active voice, restructure the sentence to highlight the actor. For example, instead of "The concentration was determined with HPLC", you can say "Researchers determined the concentration with HPLC".

What is a more formal alternative to "was determined with"?

A more formal alternative is "was ascertained by". This emphasizes the careful and exact nature of the finding.

Is it always better to use the active voice instead of "was determined with"?

Not always. The passive voice is useful when the actor is unknown or unimportant, or when you want to emphasize the result rather than the actor. However, overuse of the passive voice can make writing sound less direct.

What's the difference between "was determined with" and "was measured by"?

"Was determined with" is a broader term that can refer to any process of finding something out, while "was measured by" specifically refers to finding a quantity using a measuring instrument or technique.