was demonstrated in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was demonstrated in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to evidence or examples that support a claim or theory in a specific context, such as research or analysis. Example: "The effectiveness of the new teaching method was demonstrated in a recent study conducted by the university."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Conformational coupling was demonstrated in the ligand-bound state40.

Nature

Active GSK-3 production was demonstrated in AD mice.

Nature

The first graphene-based modulator was demonstrated in 2011.

MIT Technology Review

Blood compatibility was demonstrated in vitro.

International Journal of Pharmaceutics

Mobile messaging's value was demonstrated in Haiti, following the earthquake in 2010.

The Guardian

That Stramaccioni has his favour was demonstrated in their post-game comments.

The Guardian - Sport

The undermining of truth throughout this travesty was demonstrated in its "coverage" of a cowed media.

The Guardian - Opinion

In a tile-floored room, equipment was demonstrated in a small kitchen.

The New York Times

The duality of the Bush strategy was demonstrated in another way.

The New York Times

This was demonstrated in a participatory video project in Guatemala and Uganda.

The Guardian

In the 1970's, the first FEL in the Raman regime was demonstrated in Marshall's Lab.

Columbia University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was demonstrated in" to highlight instances where a concept, theory, or method has been practically proven or successfully applied.

Common error

While grammatically correct, overuse of passive voice constructions like "was demonstrated in" can make writing sound weak or vague. Consider using active voice when appropriate for a more direct and engaging style.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was demonstrated in" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something has been proven or shown within a specific context. It typically introduces evidence or examples that support a claim. As Ludwig AI notes, this passive construction is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

30%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was demonstrated in" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction. Ludwig AI analysis confirms its validity. It serves to present evidence or support for a claim, commonly found in science, news, and academic contexts. When writing, ensure clarity and context. While appropriate for formal writing, avoid overuse for a more engaging style. Consider synonyms like "was shown in" or "was proven in" for variety.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was shown in

Focuses on the act of displaying or presenting something in a particular context, rather than proving it.

was proven in

Emphasizes the verification or confirmation of something as true within a specific context.

was illustrated in

Highlights how something is clarified or exemplified through a specific instance.

was evidenced by

Focuses on the provision of proof or support for something through a specific source.

was highlighted in

Emphasizes the act of drawing attention to something important within a specific context.

was revealed in

Suggests the uncovering or disclosure of something previously unknown within a specific context.

was confirmed in

Focuses on the validation or corroboration of something within a specific context.

was established in

Highlights the creation or foundation of something within a specific context.

was determined in

Implies that something was definitively decided or ascertained within a specific context.

was observed in

Focuses on the act of noticing or witnessing something within a specific context.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "was demonstrated in" to sound more active?

Consider using alternatives like "showed", "proved", or "illustrated". For example, instead of "The effect "was demonstrated in" a study", you could say "A study showed the effect".

Is it always better to avoid passive voice constructions like "was demonstrated in"?

Not always. Passive voice is useful when the action is more important than the actor, or when the actor is unknown or irrelevant. However, overuse can lead to less engaging writing. Use "was shown in", "was proven in", or "was illustrated in" for similar meaning.

What's the difference between "was demonstrated in" and "was suggested by"?

"Was demonstrated in" implies a clearer, more conclusive finding or proof, while "was suggested by" indicates a hypothesis or preliminary finding that requires further investigation. See also: "was evidenced by".

In academic writing, is "was demonstrated in" preferred over more informal alternatives?

"Was demonstrated in" is suitable for academic writing due to its neutral and objective tone. However, always ensure clarity and avoid overuse. "Was evidenced by" is another good alternative.