Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was demolished
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was demolished" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe an event where a structure or building has been destroyed or taken down in the past. Example: "The old factory was demolished to make way for a new shopping center."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
58 human-written examples
The house was demolished.
News & Media
Eventually it was demolished.
News & Media
Concert Grove House was demolished.
News & Media
The bungalow was demolished.
News & Media
His house was demolished.
News & Media
The deli was demolished.
News & Media
It was demolished in 1936.
News & Media
- was demolished by Richard Dawkins.
News & Media
House was demolished in 1994.
News & Media
The theatre was demolished in 1988.
Encyclopedias
Its castle was demolished in 1495.
Encyclopedias
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "was demolished" to clearly and concisely indicate that a structure has been completely destroyed or removed. This phrase is suitable for both formal and informal contexts.
Common error
Avoid using "was demolished" repeatedly in descriptive passages. Vary your vocabulary with synonyms like "razed", "torn down", or "destroyed" to maintain reader engagement.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was demolished" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a subject (usually a building or structure) underwent the action of being demolished. This construction shifts the focus from the actor (the one doing the demolishing) to the recipient of the action (the thing being demolished). As indicated by Ludwig AI, this phrase is grammatically sound and widely used.
Frequent in
News & Media
51%
Encyclopedias
24%
Wiki
22%
Less common in
Formal & Business
1%
Science
1%
Reference
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "was demolished" is a common and grammatically sound passive voice construction used to describe the act of something being destroyed, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. Its usage spans across various contexts, from news reports to encyclopedia entries, reflecting a neutral register. While alternatives like "was torn down" or "was razed" exist, "was demolished" provides a clear and concise way to communicate the complete destruction of a structure. Be mindful of overuse in descriptive writing and diversify your vocabulary when appropriate. Also, the phrase is "Very common" due to its many examples.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was torn down
Implies a forceful removal, often piece by piece.
was razed
Suggests complete leveling to the ground.
was destroyed
A general term for rendering something unusable.
was leveled
Similar to 'razed', implying making something flat.
was dismantled
Indicates careful taking apart, often for reuse of components.
was knocked down
Suggests a forceful impact leading to collapse.
was taken down
A more general term for removal.
was pulled down
Implies a vertical force used in destruction.
was wrecked
Suggests violent and chaotic destruction.
was eliminated
Broader term implying something being removed or terminated, not necessarily physical destruction.
FAQs
How to use "was demolished" in a sentence?
Use "was demolished" to indicate that something has been completely destroyed or taken down. For example, "The old building was demolished to make way for a new park."
What can I say instead of "was demolished"?
You can use alternatives like "was torn down", "was razed", or "was destroyed" depending on the context.
Which is correct, "was demolished" or "has been demolished"?
Both "was demolished" and "has been demolished" are grammatically correct. "Was demolished" refers to a completed action in the past, while "has been demolished" indicates an action completed at some point before now with relevance to the present.
What's the difference between "was demolished" and "was dismantled"?
"Was demolished" implies complete destruction, while "was dismantled" suggests a careful taking apart, often with the intention of reusing components.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested