was corrected for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was corrected for" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is usually used to indicate that someone has fixed a mistake or made an improvement in something. For example: The student's paper was corrected for grammatical errors by the professor.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Multiple testing was corrected for using the Bonferroni correction [ 13].

Disease Markers

Wireless communication was corrected for adding initial start-up bytes.

Cornell University

It was corrected for intensity fluctuations using the reference beam.

Nature

NDVI was corrected for sensor degradation and atmospheric errors.

Advances in Space Research

The issue was corrected for the West Coast telecast".

The New York Times

Twitter @bosiechampagne This article was corrected for errors 16:00, 8 August.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Recorded fluorescence was corrected for background and normalized to the baseline value (∆F/F0).

Nature

Each SPGR was corrected for signal in-homogeneity and skull-stripped using FSL's Brain Extraction Tool.

Nature

The relative sucrose consumption was corrected for body weight of the animals (ml/kg).

Nature

The absorption was corrected for light scattering using the apparent absorption at 320 nm.

Nature

SUV was corrected for body weight (SUVbw).

EJNMMI Research

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was corrected for", ensure clarity regarding what was corrected and the reason for the correction. Providing specific details enhances the reader's understanding.

Common error

Avoid using "was corrected for" without specifying what aspect underwent correction. For example, instead of saying "the data was corrected for", specify "the data was corrected for background noise".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was corrected for" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a subject has undergone a process of rectification or adjustment. This usage is supported by numerous examples in Ludwig, showcasing its prevalence across varied contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

15%

Academia

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was corrected for" is a grammatically sound and very common passive construction used to indicate that something has been rectified or adjusted, particularly in formal and scientific contexts. As confirmed by Ludwig, the phrase effectively conveys that adjustments have been made to enhance accuracy or account for specific factors. While it's prevalent across scientific, academic, and news domains, it's essential to specify the element undergoing correction to avoid ambiguity. Related phrases like "was adjusted for" and "was revised to" offer similar meanings with subtle contextual differences.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was adjusted to account for

Highlights the adjustment made to consider specific factors.

was revised to address

Focuses on the revision process aimed at resolving specific issues.

was amended to reflect

Indicates a formal change to accurately represent something.

was modified to compensate for

Emphasizes the changes made to offset or balance a particular effect.

was rectified to eliminate

Focuses on the process of correcting something to remove errors.

was recalibrated for

Highlights the process of readjusting for accuracy, often in technical contexts.

was refined to improve

Suggests a process of improvement and precision.

was updated to fix

Emphasizes bringing something current to resolve a problem.

underwent correction for

Focuses on the fact that the subject experienced a corrective process.

was fine-tuned to

Highlights precise adjustments made for optimal performance.

FAQs

How can I use "was corrected for" in a sentence?

You can use "was corrected for" to indicate that an error or inaccuracy has been rectified. For example, "The experimental data was corrected for systematic errors".

What phrases are similar to "was corrected for"?

Similar phrases include "was adjusted for", "was revised to", or "was amended to", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "was corrected for" or "was corrected by"?

"Was corrected for" typically indicates the factor or reason for the correction, while "was corrected by" indicates the person or method that performed the correction. The better choice depends on what you want to emphasize.

What's the difference between "was corrected for" and "was adjusted for"?

"Was corrected for" generally implies fixing an error, whereas "was adjusted for" suggests modifying something to account for a specific factor or condition.