was contributed from

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was contributed from" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly when trying to indicate the source of a contribution. Example: "The research findings were contributed from various experts in the field."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

16 human-written examples

The XYZMODEM protocol code was contributed from Finland.

Columbia University

It is to be bought for $1.5 million, which was contributed from a museum donor, and the sale is to be closed by the end of the year.

The New York Times

This far higher degree of carbonization was contributed from the dual role of the local carbonization of PS particles in the composite and the good dispersity of the composite powder, resulting in a much better contrast to the patterns.

Materials & Design

The addition of the dryer exhausts as heat sources was a critical factor in gaining a heat recovery of 10.8 MW for the variable temperature storage design, of which 5.1 MW was contributed from exhaust heat recovery.

Energy

Reporting was contributed from Julie Turkewitz in Denver, Jess Bidgood in Boston, Alan Blinder in Atlanta, Fernanda Santos in Phoenix, Nick Corasaniti and Katie Rogers in Washington, Christina Capecchi in St . Paul Mitch Smith in Chicago, and Emma G. Fitzsimmons and Giovanni Russonello in New York.

The New York Times

The higher intensity background recorded before the (110) peak was contributed from the glass slide used to hold the samples.

Nanoscale Research Letters

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

44 human-written examples

(And incidentally Greenwald was contributing from Rio de Janeiro, but he had to leave his home there to transmit from a big city hotel, where the internet connection was better).

Huffington Post

Again in these bilayers, the HOMO is contributed from one layer and the LUMO is contributed from the other layer.

Nature

European nations could not agree on how much should be contributed from the public purse.

The New York Times

A total of 7183 pathogens were contributed from 6 predetermined pathogen groups.

Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease

E.U. nations could not agree on how much should be contributed from the public purse, bitterly disappointing environmental campaigners and U.N. officials.

The New York Times - Science

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When indicating the source of a contribution, use "by" instead of "from". For example, say "The study was contributed by several researchers" not "The study was contributed from several researchers".

Common error

Avoid using "from" to identify the direct source of a contribution. "From" typically indicates origin or starting point, while "by" correctly attributes the contribution to a person or entity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was contributed from" functions as a passive voice construction intended to indicate the source of something. However, this usage is grammatically incorrect. Correct alternatives like "was contributed by" should be used instead.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

63%

News & Media

25%

Academia

6%

Less common in

Wiki

6%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

While the phrase "was contributed from" appears in a number of contexts, including science, news, and academia, it's important to recognize that it is grammatically incorrect. The correct way to indicate the source of a contribution is to use "was contributed by" or other similar alternatives like "stemmed from" or "originated from". Ludwig AI confirms this assessment, therefore, writers should avoid using "was contributed from" to maintain grammatical accuracy and clarity in their writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was contributed by

Replaces 'from' with 'by' to correctly indicate the source of the contribution.

was sourced from

Indicates where something was obtained or procured.

originated from

Indicates the starting point or source of something.

stemmed from

Implies that something arose or developed from a particular source.

derived from

Suggests that something is obtained or comes from a particular source.

was provided by

Focuses on the act of supplying or furnishing something.

was given by

Highlights the act of donating or offering something.

was developed by

Emphasizes the process of growth or improvement by a specific entity.

was created by

Indicates who or what made something.

was produced by

Highlights the act of manufacturing or generating something.

FAQs

What's the correct way to say something was contributed by someone?

The correct phrase is "was contributed by", as in "The artwork was contributed by local artists". The phrase "was contributed from" is grammatically incorrect.

What can I say instead of "was contributed from"?

You can use alternatives like "was contributed by", "originated from", or "stemmed from" depending on the context.

Is "was contributed from" grammatically correct?

No, "was contributed from" is not grammatically correct. The correct phrasing is "was contributed by". Ludwig AI confirms this assessment.

How do I properly attribute a contribution?

Use the phrase "was contributed by" followed by the name of the person or organization that made the contribution. For example, "The data was contributed by the National Institute of Health".