was contributed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was contributed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was given or added by someone in the past. Example: "The research paper was contributed by several leading scientists in the field."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This archive was contributed by D Golomb.

Yale University

This model was contributed by A. Kozlov.

Yale University

This model was contributed by Alon Korngreen.

Yale University

This model was contributed by Ali Hummos.

Yale University

This code was contributed by Sadra Sadeh.

Yale University

This model was contributed by S Damodaran.

Yale University

This model was contributed by Feng Feng.

Yale University

Additional reporting was contributed by Stanley Widianto.

The Washington Post

Research was contributed by Susan C. Beachy.

The New York Times

Reporting was contributed by Somini Sengupta.

The New York Times

Reporting was contributed by Lorena Bornacelli.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was contributed", ensure the context clearly identifies who or what made the contribution. This enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "was contributed" excessively in situations where an active voice would be more direct and engaging. For example, instead of "The article was contributed by John", consider "John contributed the article".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was contributed" functions as a passive voice construction of the verb "contribute". It indicates that something (an object, idea, or effort) was given or added by someone or something else. Ludwig AI confirms this usage is correct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Academia

37%

News & Media

35%

Science

27%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was contributed" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction that signifies something was given or added. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage is correct and versatile. It's commonly found in academic, news, and scientific contexts. When using it, ensure clear attribution to avoid ambiguity. While generally formal, overuse can lead to less engaging writing, so consider active voice alternatives where appropriate.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was provided

Emphasizes the act of supplying something.

was supplied

Similar to "was provided", highlighting the act of furnishing or making something available.

was given

A more general term for the act of handing something over.

was added

Focuses on the action of joining or including something to an existing entity.

was donated

Specifically indicates that something was given as a gift or contribution, often to a charitable cause.

was furnished

Implies the act of equipping or providing necessary items.

was presented

Suggests a formal act of giving or offering something.

was submitted

Indicates the act of formally handing in something for consideration or review.

was allocated

Focuses on the act of distributing or assigning something for a specific purpose.

was assigned

Highlights the act of giving someone a specific task or responsibility.

FAQs

How can I use "was contributed" in a sentence?

Use "was contributed" to indicate that something was given or added by someone or something. For example, "The research paper was contributed by several scientists."

What are some alternatives to "was contributed"?

You can use alternatives like "was provided", "was supplied", or "was given" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "was contributed by" or "contributed by"?

Both are grammatically correct, but "was contributed by" emphasizes the passive voice, while "contributed by" can be used in active constructions. For example: "The article was contributed by John" vs "John contributed the article".

What's the difference between "was contributed" and "was attributed"?

"Was contributed" means something was given or added. "Was attributed" means something was credited or assigned as a cause or origin. For example, "The error was attributed to a software bug".