Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(14)
From 1964 to 1983, the agency's advertising billings grew to $60 million, which was considered substantial for an agency outside New York.
Agreement was categorized a priori as follows: k of 0.61 or greater was considered substantial agreement; k of 0.21 to 0.60, moderate agreement; and k of 0.20 or less was considered slight agreement.
The damage caused to the aircraft was considered substantial.
A trend was considered substantial if the 90% CL did not overlap zero.
The I statistic was to be used to quantify heterogeneity, where I > 50% was considered substantial heterogeneity.
Heterogeneity was considered substantial if I2 was greater than 50% and a random effects model applied; otherwise a fixed effects model was used for the analysis [ 20].
Similar(45)
But even half that number has to be considered substantial.
And though next year's projected deficit has grown to $6.4 billion, that is considered substantial but not unmanageable in a budget approaching $130 billion.
It has progressed from a small-time exchange, where 1,000-share 1,000-share considered substradesl, to a place weree huge hunks of considerednsubstantiald toe world each millisecond.
According to the government, the threat of international terrorism at the London Marathon on Sunday is considered "substantial", while the event also faces a "moderate" threat of Northern Ireland-related terrorism.
A kappa value of more than 0.7 is considered substantial for a given study.
More suggestions(19)
was considered crucial
was considered important
was considered major
was considered large
was considered great
was considered considerable
was considered serious
was considered essential
was considered noticeable
was considered massive
was considered enormous
was considered insufficient
was considered notable
was considered huge
be viewed as substantial
was considered significant
was considered negligible
was considered relevant
was considered informative
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com