Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
It was compared, by critics, to a giant, reckless hedge fund.
Follicle count was compared by Chi-square.
The sequencing result was compared by BLAST for homology analysis.
Treatment effectiveness was compared by synthesizing direct and indirect evidences using NMA.
The biomechanical data was compared by a Student's t-test (SPSS 15.00).
The reader interpretation time for CXR and DTS was compared by Wilcoxon's signed rank test.
Distribution of categorical variables was compared by Fisher´s exact test.
The applicability of the isotherm equations was compared by judging the correlation coefficients, R2.
Its catalytic performance was compared by using propane oxidative dehydrogenation reaction.
Performance of the various classifiers was compared by the error rate.
Image sharpness was compared by measuring the diameter of point targets and directional edge sharpness.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com