was committed with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was committed with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly when trying to express that an action was carried out or performed, but the preposition "with" is not appropriate in this context. Example: "The crime was committed with a weapon." (This should be "The crime was committed using a weapon.")

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

17 human-written examples

An additional four years could be added if the crime was committed with another person.

The Washington Post

State media said Warmbier's crime was committed with "the tacit connivance of the US government and under its manipulation".

The Guardian

He testified in detail about the trip from Laramie to Saratoga where the crime was committed with stops in Medicine Bow and Elk Mountain.

Cornell University

The first project will be a review of the current uses of neuroimaging in criminal trials, and in particular, in cases where the defendant alleges that the crime was committed with an impaired mental state.

Harvard University

The Environment Agency's report conceded that if the allegations against Trafigura were true, "a serious offence was committed with relevant aspect of the conduct taking place within the jurisdiction".

The Guardian

In those states, juries decide if a defendant is guilty and then a judge makes the crucial finding of whether a murder was committed with aggravating circumstances that warrant a sentence of death.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

43 human-written examples

Most of these were committed with handguns.

The Economist

Most gun murders are committed with handguns.

The Guardian

We are committed with the government to address these issues.

The Guardian

Many of the killings were committed with knives.

The New York Times

Around four-fifths of murders are committed with firearms, which are readily available.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "was committed with" in formal writing. Opt for phrases like "was carried out using" or "was perpetrated through" for greater clarity and grammatical accuracy.

Common error

A common mistake is using "with" to describe the means by which an action is performed. Instead, use "using", "through", or "by means of" to indicate the instrument or method employed.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was committed with" functions as a passive construction where an action (often negative, like a crime or error) is linked to the instrument or method used. However, as noted by Ludwig AI, the preposition "with" is often misused, suggesting a need for alternatives.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

63%

Academia

21%

Wiki

4%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

4%

Science

4%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "was committed with" appears frequently in various sources, including news and academic contexts, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically questionable. It's often used to describe the means by which an action was carried out, particularly in the context of crimes. However, it's recommended to use more precise and grammatically correct alternatives like "was carried out using" or "was perpetrated through" to ensure clarity and accuracy in writing. News & Media are the contexts in which you will most probably find this phrase. Overall, adopting these best practices can enhance the quality and precision of your communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was carried out using

Replaces "committed with" to specify the means by which something was done.

was conducted using

Indicates the method or tool used in carrying out a process or action.

was perpetrated through

Emphasizes the method or channel through which an action was executed.

was implemented through

Highlights the system or process through which an action was put into effect.

was effected by means of

A formal way of indicating the instrument or method used to achieve a result.

was accomplished via

Suggests that something was achieved using a particular method or tool.

was executed utilizing

Highlights the use of a specific tool or strategy to carry out an action.

was performed employing

Similar to 'utilizing', but slightly more formal, indicating the use of resources or methods.

was achieved with the aid of

Focuses on assistance or support that enabled the action.

was facilitated by

Emphasizes the enabling factors that made the action possible.

FAQs

How can I correctly phrase a sentence using the idea of "was committed with"?

Instead of saying "was committed with", consider using phrases like "was carried out using", "was perpetrated through", or "was executed with". These alternatives provide greater clarity and grammatical correctness.

What's a more grammatically sound alternative to "was committed with"?

Alternatives such as "was carried out using", "was perpetrated through", or "was effected by means of" offer better grammatical structure and precision.

Is "was committed with" considered grammatically correct in formal writing?

No, "was committed with" is generally not considered grammatically correct in formal writing. It's preferable to use more precise and standard phrases like "was carried out using" or "was accomplished via".

In what contexts might I encounter "was committed with", and why should I be cautious?

While you might find "was committed with" in various sources, including news articles, it's often an indication of less formal or hastily written content. Always aim for clearer and more grammatically accurate phrasing in your own writing, like "was conducted using" or "was implemented through".