was committed

USAGE SUMMARY

"was committed" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is a verb phrase that can be used to express an action that has been executed in the past. For example, "He was committed to the mental institution five years ago."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

A. He was committed.

The New York Times - Magazine

That mistake was committed before.

The New York Times

Lincoln was committed to both.

The New York Times - Books

No crime was committed, right?

The Economist

No fraud was committed.

The New York Times - Arts

The crime was committed in Aug. 2011.

The New York Times

"Every player was committed at that point".

The New York Times

Quite possibly a crime was committed.

The New York Times

He was committed to empowering the powerless.

The New York Times

He was committed to a psychiatric institute.

Independent

Nevertheless, he was committed to the forest.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was committed", ensure that the context clearly indicates whether it refers to dedication, entrustment, or the commission of an act. Clarity prevents ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "was committed" without clear context. The phrase has multiple meanings – dedicated, entrusted, or having committed an act. Provide specific details to ensure your intended meaning is understood.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was committed" functions primarily as a passive verb phrase, indicating that someone or something was subjected to an action. Ludwig AI validates the correctness and usability of this phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Academia

30%

Science

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was committed" is a versatile verb phrase with multiple meanings: dedication, entrustment, or perpetration. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage. It's most frequently found in News & Media and Academic contexts. To ensure clarity, always provide sufficient context to avoid ambiguity. Consider using alternatives like "was dedicated" or "was entrusted", depending on the desired nuance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was dedicated

Focuses more on the act of devoting oneself to a purpose or task, rather than a state of being.

was devoted

Similar to "was dedicated", this emphasizes a deep sense of loyalty and affection.

was entrusted

Highlights the act of giving responsibility or care to someone.

was consigned

Emphasizes the act of assigning or handing something over to someone's control.

was perpetrated

Specifically used when referring to a crime or negative action being carried out.

was confined

Implies a restriction or limitation, often physically or mentally.

was institutionalized

Specifically refers to being placed in an institution, often for mental health reasons.

was predisposed

Suggests a tendency or inclination towards something.

was inclined

Similar to "was predisposed", but can also indicate a willingness.

was predisposed toward

The addition of "toward" clarifies the direction of inclination.

FAQs

How can I use "was committed" in a sentence?

You can use "was committed" to indicate dedication (e.g., "He was committed to the project"), entrustment (e.g., "The task was committed to her care"), or the commission of an act (e.g., "A crime was committed").

What phrases are similar to "was committed"?

Similar phrases include "was dedicated", "was devoted", or "was entrusted", depending on the intended meaning.

Is it correct to say "a mistake was committed"?

Yes, it's grammatically correct to say "a mistake was committed". It's a common way to express that an error occurred, as shown in Ludwig's examples.

What's the difference between "was committed to" and "was dedicated to"?

"Was committed to" and "was dedicated to" are often interchangeable when expressing devotion or allegiance. However, "was committed to" can also imply being confined or entrusted, which "was dedicated to" does not.