was characterized for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was characterized for" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct expression is "was characterized by." Example: "The novel was characterized by its intricate plot and well-developed characters."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The drug-loaded nanoparticle was characterized for physical and biological characterizations.

BMC Cancer

It was characterized for its physical properties and chemical composition.

Construction and Building Materials

The obtained graft was characterized for its architecture, extracellular matrix proteins, mechanical and immunological properties.

Biomaterials

The developed inclusion complex was characterized for solubility, encapsulation efficiency, FTIR, FESEM, XRD.

Materials Science and Engineering: C

The optimized film was characterized for its physical, thermal and structural behavior.

International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

The POT Ag nanocomposite was characterized for morphological, structural, thermal and electrical properties.

Materials Letters

The GRDF was characterized for apparent density, buoyancy, porosity and dissolution using in vitro experimentations.

International Journal of Pharmaceutics

In addition, it was characterized for those compounds logPo/w values between 2.1 and 2.9.

European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

The microfabricated cantilever was characterized for its resonant frequency and actuation sensitivity.

Sensors and Actuators A: Physical

The optimized microsphere formulation was characterized for particle size, shape, morphology and in vitro drug release.

International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

Precipitated lignin was characterized for chemical composition and thermal behavior, showing similar features to commercial lignin.

Renewable Energy

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Replace "was characterized for" with the grammatically correct "was characterized by" to ensure clarity and accuracy in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "for" after "characterized." The correct preposition is "by," which indicates the features or qualities that define something.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was characterized for" functions as a passive construction where something is being described or identified based on certain attributes. However, it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI indicates that the correct form is "was characterized by."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was characterized for" is frequently used, particularly in scientific and technical writing, to describe something based on its attributes. However, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "was characterized by". While examples show its prevalence across diverse scientific contexts, it's crucial to use "was characterized by" to maintain grammatical accuracy and clarity. Alternatives include "was defined by", "was marked by", and "was distinguished by".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was defined by

Emphasizes the defining attributes or features.

was marked by

Highlights notable or distinctive traits.

was distinguished by

Focuses on unique or exceptional qualities.

was known for

Indicates a recognized or popular attribute.

was typified by

Suggests a representative or exemplary instance.

was featured with

Highlights prominent elements or aspects.

was embodied by

Implies a concrete representation or manifestation.

was represented by

Focuses on symbolic or illustrative aspects.

was determined by

Indicates causative or influential factors.

was assessed for

Highlights the evaluation process based on quality or performance.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "characterized" in a sentence?

The correct way is to use "characterized by," as in "The novel "was characterized by" its intricate plot." The phrase "was characterized for" is grammatically incorrect.

What can I say instead of "was characterized for"?

You can use alternatives like "was defined by", "was marked by", or "was distinguished by" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "was characterized for" or "was characterized by"?

"Was characterized by" is the correct phrase. "Was characterized for" is generally considered grammatically incorrect.

What's the difference between "was characterized for" and "was assessed for"?

"Was assessed for" implies an evaluation process, while the grammatically correct ""was characterized by"" describes inherent qualities or features.