Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was characterised by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was characterised by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe the defining features or qualities of a person, event, or situation in a formal context. Example: "The project was characterised by innovative design and collaborative teamwork."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(20)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
It was characterised by two conflicting aims.
News & Media
Winter was characterised by multi-day cyclical behaviour.
Science & Research
Leadsom's leadership campaign was characterised by incompetence, grandstanding and vacuity.
News & Media
The melt season was characterised by a diurnal cycle.
Science & Research
His time with the Socceroos was characterised by strict discipline.
News & Media
Soloist Paul Watkins' interpretation was characterised by a searing intensity.
News & Media
The microstructure was characterised by TEM.
Science
Rossetti's art was characterised by its sensuality and its medieval revivalism.
Academia
PRS was characterised by UV, EEM and NMR spectral analysis.
Additionally the microreactor unit was characterised by infrared (IR) spectroscopy.
Science
The compound was characterised by analytical and spectral methods.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "was characterised by", ensure that the subject is clearly defined and that the characteristics you are attributing to it are specific and supported by evidence or context.
Common error
While "was characterised by" is grammatically correct, overuse of passive voice can make your writing sound weak or indirect. Consider rephrasing to use active voice when appropriate, for example: 'Innovative design and collaborative teamwork characterised the project' instead of 'The project was characterised by innovative design and collaborative teamwork'.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was characterised by" functions as a passive verb phrase used to attribute qualities or features to a subject. It indicates that the subject is defined or distinguished by certain characteristics. Ludwig AI provides numerous examples demonstrating its usage across diverse contexts.
Frequent in
Science
52%
News & Media
41%
Formal & Business
2%
Less common in
Academia
1%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "was characterised by" is a versatile phrase used to describe and define a subject based on its prominent attributes. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread usage, particularly in scientific and journalistic writing. While highly functional, it's important to be mindful of passive voice and consider using active voice alternatives for a more impactful style. Understanding its nuances and exploring alternative phrasings can greatly enhance clarity and sophistication in writing. The phrase is most frequently found in "Science" and "News & Media" contexts.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was defined by
This alternative focuses on the defining aspects of something.
was marked by
This alternative highlights the noticeable features or events.
was distinguished by
This alternative emphasizes unique or notable qualities.
was known for
This alternative indicates a common perception or reputation.
featured
This is a more concise verb highlighting key attributes.
exhibited
This alternative suggests displaying particular qualities or traits.
displayed
Similar to 'exhibited', this highlights observable traits.
possessed
This implies having certain qualities or attributes.
was notable for
This emphasizes aspects worthy of attention.
was typified by
This signifies being a typical example of something.
FAQs
How can I use "was characterised by" in a sentence?
Use "was characterised by" to describe the prominent features or qualities of a subject. For example: "The meeting was characterised by lively debate."
What are some alternatives to "was characterised by"?
You can use alternatives such as "was defined by", "was marked by", or "was known for" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it better to use active or passive voice with "characterised by"?
While "was characterised by" (passive voice) is correct, using the active voice (e.g., "the era characterised") can sometimes make your writing more direct and impactful. Choose the voice that best suits the context and your intended emphasis.
What's the difference between "was characterised by" and "was typified by"?
"Was characterised by" describes general or prominent features, while "was typified by" suggests that something is a representative example or a standard instance of something else. The choice depends on whether you're describing general traits or typical examples.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested