Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was characterised by

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was characterised by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe the defining features or qualities of a person, event, or situation in a formal context. Example: "The project was characterised by innovative design and collaborative teamwork."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It was characterised by two conflicting aims.

News & Media

The Economist

Winter was characterised by multi-day cyclical behaviour.

Science & Research

Nature

Leadsom's leadership campaign was characterised by incompetence, grandstanding and vacuity.

The melt season was characterised by a diurnal cycle.

Science & Research

Nature

His time with the Socceroos was characterised by strict discipline.

Soloist Paul Watkins' interpretation was characterised by a searing intensity.

The microstructure was characterised by TEM.

Rossetti's art was characterised by its sensuality and its medieval revivalism.

PRS was characterised by UV, EEM and NMR spectral analysis.

Additionally the microreactor unit was characterised by infrared (IR) spectroscopy.

The compound was characterised by analytical and spectral methods.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was characterised by", ensure that the subject is clearly defined and that the characteristics you are attributing to it are specific and supported by evidence or context.

Common error

While "was characterised by" is grammatically correct, overuse of passive voice can make your writing sound weak or indirect. Consider rephrasing to use active voice when appropriate, for example: 'Innovative design and collaborative teamwork characterised the project' instead of 'The project was characterised by innovative design and collaborative teamwork'.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was characterised by" functions as a passive verb phrase used to attribute qualities or features to a subject. It indicates that the subject is defined or distinguished by certain characteristics. Ludwig AI provides numerous examples demonstrating its usage across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

52%

News & Media

41%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Academia

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was characterised by" is a versatile phrase used to describe and define a subject based on its prominent attributes. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread usage, particularly in scientific and journalistic writing. While highly functional, it's important to be mindful of passive voice and consider using active voice alternatives for a more impactful style. Understanding its nuances and exploring alternative phrasings can greatly enhance clarity and sophistication in writing. The phrase is most frequently found in "Science" and "News & Media" contexts.

FAQs

How can I use "was characterised by" in a sentence?

Use "was characterised by" to describe the prominent features or qualities of a subject. For example: "The meeting was characterised by lively debate."

What are some alternatives to "was characterised by"?

You can use alternatives such as "was defined by", "was marked by", or "was known for" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "characterised by"?

While "was characterised by" (passive voice) is correct, using the active voice (e.g., "the era characterised") can sometimes make your writing more direct and impactful. Choose the voice that best suits the context and your intended emphasis.

What's the difference between "was characterised by" and "was typified by"?

"Was characterised by" describes general or prominent features, while "was typified by" suggests that something is a representative example or a standard instance of something else. The choice depends on whether you're describing general traits or typical examples.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: