Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was categorised as
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was categorised as" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing how something has been classified or labeled in a particular way. Example: "The species was categorised as endangered due to its declining population."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Gender was categorised as male or female and marital status was categorised as currently married versus not currently married.
Science
The business was categorised as "manufacture of other food products".
News & Media
In its time, this vision was categorised as science fiction.
News & Media
"My semi-intellectual stance was categorised as a personality disorder".
News & Media
But his death was categorised as "manslaughter by negligence" and Kerrick was recorded as having been known to the victim.
News & Media
The second most common cause of death was categorised as "senile decay", which indicated physical frailty rather than dementia.
News & Media
Location was categorised as supramuscular, intermuscular, intramuscular or submuscular.
Science
Shape was categorised as roundish, oblong, fusiform or geographical.
Science
Tumour vessel density or vascularity was categorised as high, moderate or low vascularity.
Science
Acoustic transmission was categorised as being greater than, equal to or less than adjacent musculature.
Science
In 1990 the Old Maltings was categorised as a Grade II listed building.
Wiki
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Provide context for the categorization by briefly explaining the significance or implications of the classification.
Common error
Avoid mixing categories that are not mutually exclusive. Ensure that items placed in different categories do not overlap or share characteristics that would make their classification ambiguous. Use consistent criteria when categorizing items.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was categorised as" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a subject has been assigned to a specific category. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this phrase is commonly used and grammatically sound.
Frequent in
Science
65%
News & Media
25%
Wiki
5%
Less common in
Formal & Business
2%
Encyclopedias
1%
Reference
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "was categorised as" is a grammatically correct and frequently employed phrase used to indicate how something has been classified or grouped. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage is widespread across diverse fields, most prominently in scientific literature and news media. When employing this phrase, it is advisable to maintain consistent categorization criteria to enhance clarity. Alternative phrases such as "was classified as" or "was grouped as" can be used to convey similar meanings. Ensuring the categories remain mutually exclusive is also crucial to avoid ambiguity. Ludwig's analysis shows this phrase has a neutral tone and serves to inform, making it an invaluable tool in various forms of writing.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was classified as
Changes the verb from 'categorise' to 'classify', offering a direct synonym with nearly identical meaning.
was grouped as
Replaces 'categorised' with 'grouped', suggesting a collection into a specific set.
was identified as
Shifts the focus to the act of recognizing and labeling something based on specific criteria.
was labeled as
Emphasizes the assignment of a label or descriptor to a particular item or concept.
was designated as
Indicates a formal assignment or naming of something for a specific purpose.
was defined as
Highlights the establishment of a precise meaning or scope for a term or concept.
was considered as
Suggests an evaluation or judgment leading to a particular categorization.
was regarded as
Implies a general opinion or perception that leads to a specific classification.
was characterized as
Focuses on describing the main qualities or features that define how something is categorized.
was sorted as
Emphasizes the act of organizing items into distinct categories based on shared attributes.
FAQs
How can I use "was categorised as" in a sentence?
Use "was categorised as" to indicate how something has been classified or grouped based on specific criteria. For example, "The study participants were categorised as either smokers or non-smokers".
What are some alternatives to "was categorised as"?
You can use alternatives like "was classified as", "was grouped as", or "was identified as" depending on the specific context.
Is there a difference between "was categorised as" and "was classified as"?
While the terms are often interchangeable, "was categorised as" might suggest a more systematic or structured approach to grouping items, whereas "was classified as" can be a more general term. The best choice depends on the context and desired emphasis.
What does it mean when something "was categorised as" something else?
When something "was categorised as" something else, it means that it was assigned to a particular group or class based on shared characteristics or criteria. This helps to organize and understand information.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested