Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was built with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was built with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe the materials, tools, or methods used in the construction or creation of something. Example: "The bridge was built with steel and concrete to ensure its durability and strength."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
"It was built with a real opinion.
News & Media
"It was built with some engineering foresight".
News & Media
The unit was built with recycled materials.
News & Media
ADO.NET was built with scalability in mind.
The model was built with Autobuild in the Phenix suite69.
Science & Research
The newer tunnel was built with reinforced concrete.
News & Media
Yankee Stadium was built with concrete from Edison's cement company.
Encyclopedias
Alignment was built with CLC Main Workbench 7.6.2 (QIAGEN).
Science & Research
The Plum Book mobile site was built with Backbone.js.js
News & Media
"The entire temple was built with my money.
News & Media
"The park was built with bridle paths," Mr. Benepe added.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "was built with" to clearly indicate that certain features or characteristics were intentionally included in the original design or construction.
Common error
Avoid using "was built with" for purely abstract concepts or ideas. It's more appropriate for physical structures or systems. Use phrases like "was based on" or "was developed from" instead for abstract subjects.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was built with" functions as a passive construction indicating the materials, components, or methods used in creating something. As Ludwig AI points out, it's a correct and usable phrase.
Frequent in
News & Media
33%
Science
31%
Academia
12%
Less common in
Wiki
10%
Formal & Business
2%
Encyclopedias
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "was built with" is a grammatically sound and very common way to express the materials, components, or methods used to construct something. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is appropriate in various contexts, from news and media to scientific publications. When writing, it's important to use "was built with" to describe literal construction effectively, and remember the wealth of related alternatives if more precise language is needed.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was constructed from
Focuses on the construction process and the materials used.
was made using
Emphasizes the tools or techniques employed in the creation.
was created out of
Highlights the origin or source of the materials.
was assembled with
Suggests a process of putting different parts together.
was fabricated from
Implies a more technical or industrial manufacturing process.
incorporated
Focuses on the inclusion of certain elements or features.
featured
Highlights notable aspects included during construction.
utilized
Indicates the use of specific resources or technologies.
was composed of
Describes the elements forming the whole structure.
was designed around
Indicates core design consideration when creating something.
FAQs
How can I use "was built with" in a sentence?
Use "was built with" to describe the materials, components, or techniques employed in the construction of a physical structure or system. For example, "The house was built with sustainable materials".
What are some alternatives to "was built with"?
Alternatives include "was constructed from", "was made using", or "was assembled with". The best choice depends on the specific context.
Is it correct to say "was built by" instead of "was built with"?
While "was built with" refers to the materials or methods, "was built by" indicates who performed the construction. For example, "The house was built with bricks" versus "The house was built by skilled craftsmen".
What's the difference between "was built with" and "featured"?
"Was built with" focuses on the components used during construction, while "featured" highlights notable aspects or characteristics included in the finished product. For example, "The bridge was built with steel" versus "The bridge featured a pedestrian walkway".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested