Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was built for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was built for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate the purpose or intended use of something that has been constructed or created. Example: "This software was built for enhancing productivity in remote teams."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

It was built for speed.

News & Media

The New Yorker

It was built for the long term.

But "Glengarry" was built for speed.

News & Media

The New York Times

Gmail was built for distraction-free speed.

News & Media

The New York Times

The system was built for transporting rock.

He was built for that.

Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

5 human-written examples

It's built for speed.

News & Media

Independent

It's built for basketball.

"But this is being built for you".

News & Media

The New York Times

PARIS — Superyachts are built for luxury.

I am built for slow drowning".

News & Media

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing the function of a design or system, use "was built for" to clearly communicate its intended purpose. For example, "The website "was built for" showcasing local artists".

Common error

Avoid using "was built for" with abstract or non-physical concepts. It's more appropriate to say, "The theory was developed for explaining X" rather than "The theory "was built for" explaining X".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was built for" functions as a passive construction indicating the intended purpose or design of something. As Ludwig AI shows, this phrase is commonly used to describe the reason behind the creation of a system, structure, or tool. It is widely applicable across different contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

54%

Academia

22%

Science

19%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was built for" is a versatile phrase used to describe the intended purpose or design of something. Grammatically correct and very common, as indicated by Ludwig AI, it appears frequently in news, academic, and scientific contexts. While "was built for" functions effectively in a neutral register, alternative phrases like ""was designed for"" or "was created for" may be more suitable depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey. When writing, ensure you are using "was built for" with concrete concepts rather than abstract ideas for clarity and accuracy. This phrase is a valuable tool for clearly communicating the designed function or goal of various entities.

FAQs

How can I use "was built for" in a sentence?

Use "was built for" to describe the intended purpose or function of something that has been constructed or created. For example, "This application "was designed for" managing projects efficiently".

What are some alternatives to "was built for"?

You can use alternatives like ""was designed for"", "was created for", or "was intended for" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "is built for" instead of "was built for"?

Yes, "is built for" is correct when referring to something currently being built or a general, ongoing purpose. "Was built for" refers to something completed in the past.

What's the difference between "was built for" and "was made for"?

"Was built for" often implies a more complex or structured creation, while "was made for" can refer to simpler constructions or purposes. The distinction is often subtle and context-dependent.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

88%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: