was bound with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'was bound with' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase to describe something that was tightly secured in place, often with rope or other material. For example, "The box was bound with thick rope."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

His mouth was bound with duct tape.

The Guardian

Within minutes, the family was bound with duct tape.

The New York Times

One was bound with ribbon; the rest were perfect binds.

The New York Times - Books

Edgegayehu was ordered to strip naked and was bound with rope at her wrists and knees.

The New York Times - Magazine

It was wrapped in a plastic bag, which was bound with a zip tie.

The New Yorker

He was bound with tape, beaten, slashed, stabbed and burned with cigarettes and acid.

The New York Times

A deep gouge around the trunk was bound with duct tape.

The New Yorker

The authorities said Mr. Melero was bound with tape to the seat of his car.

The New York Times

By contrast, chitosan was bound with alginate in a steady state.

International Journal of Biological Macromolecules

Its first book was "Tolstoy's Tales," which was bound with a black spine and scarlet front and back.

The New York Times - Arts

Mr. Komma, 31, was bound with a computer cable, and Mr. Allam, 33, was found near the door.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was bound with", ensure that the context clearly indicates what is being bound and with what material or method. This provides clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using other prepositions in place of "with" when describing the binding agent. For example, instead of saying "was bound by rope", use "was bound with rope" to maintain grammatical accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was bound with" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that the subject received the action of being tied or secured. Ludwig examples demonstrate its use across various contexts, from physical restraints to the fastening of objects.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Science

32%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Wiki

7%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was bound with" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction that describes the act of securing or tying something using a specific material. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is appropriate for diverse contexts, spanning from journalistic reporting to scientific research. It's essential to use "with" to specify the material or method used in the binding. While alternatives like "was tied to" or "was secured with" exist, "was bound with" is particularly fitting when emphasizing the material used in the binding process. The examples show widespread use across sources like The New York Times, The Guardian, and scientific journals, indicating its acceptance in both formal and neutral registers.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was tied to

Focuses on the action of tying something, implying a physical connection.

was fastened to

Highlights the act of securing something firmly in place.

was connected to

Emphasizes a link or association, either physical or abstract.

was secured by

Specifies the means by which something is made safe or firm.

was attached to

Indicates a joining or fixing of one thing to another.

was affixed to

Highlights the act of sticking or fastening something to another surface.

was coupled with

Suggests a connection or association, often implying a pairing or combination.

was intertwined with

Emphasizes a close connection where elements are closely linked and affect each other.

was interwoven with

Highlights a deep and complex relationship between elements.

was associated with

Indicates a link or relationship, often implying a connection in thought or perception.

FAQs

How can I use "was bound with" in a sentence?

You can use "was bound with" to describe something that has been tied or secured using a specific material. For example, "The prisoner "was bound with chains"" or "The package "was bound with ribbon"".

What are some alternatives to the phrase "was bound with"?

Alternatives include phrases like "was tied to", "was fastened to", or "was secured with", depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "was bound by" instead of "was bound with"?

While "was bound by" can be used in some contexts to mean obligated or restricted, "was bound with" is more appropriate when describing something physically tied or secured using a material.

What is the difference between "was bound with" and "was covered with"?

"Was bound with" implies a tying or securing action, while "was covered with" indicates that something is spread over a surface. For example, "The gift "was bound with string"", whereas "The table "was covered with a cloth"".