was attributed as

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was attributed as" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct usage would typically be "was attributed to" when indicating the source of an idea or action. Example: "The discovery was attributed to the research team for their innovative approach."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

The success of the breakthrough second generation Toyota Prius was attributed as much to design, which simply made the hybrid vehicle 'normal', as much to any technological factor.

The Guardian

As other publications picked up the story, the verse was attributed as something Pacquiao, who is also a congressman in the Philippines, believed.

The New York Times - Sports

1 1 Pd Pt composition was attributed as the synergistic factor of active metal ingredients affecting the catalyst activity and stability.

Catalysis Today

In 2017 the growth of meat-free diets was attributed as the main reason for sales growth at UK-based food group, Quorn Foods.

Forbes

Edin Dzeko scored twice and another was attributed as an own goal to Wolves keeper Dorus De Vries as City scored their 15th goal in three games.

BBC

Interestingly, the GPIbα VWF bond shows high shear resistance, which was attributed as catch bond/flex bond behavior.

ACS Nano

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

44 human-written examples

The growth in crime can probably be attributed as much to a generation raised by a nanny-state as to the relaxation of government controls.

Yale University

Okay, this is an inexact science, and perhaps those sales should be attributed as much to the 50th anniversary publicity and renewed interest in the author as they are to that garish red cover.

The Guardian - Books

Yet the astronomical growth of China's social networks can be attributed as much to its massive market size as to its cultural norms and values.

TechCrunch

It can be attributed as; proper proportion of initial waste mixture enhanced the growth and activity of microorganisms.

International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture

Similarly, the victory of the English navy in the Camperdown Campaign in 1797 has been attributed as much to weather as to military tactics (Wheeler 1991).

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Prefer the phrase "was attributed to" when indicating the source or cause of something. For example, "The success of the project was attributed to the team's dedication."

Common error

Avoid using "attributed as", as it's grammatically incorrect. Always use "attributed to" to correctly indicate the source or cause. For example, avoid saying "His success was attributed as luck"; instead, say "His success was attributed to luck".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was attributed as" is used to assign a quality, cause, or origin to something. However, it's grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "was attributed to". Ludwig AI highlights this grammatical issue.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

42%

News & Media

42%

Wiki

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "was attributed as" appears in various contexts, including science and news media, it is considered grammatically incorrect. The correct phrasing is "was attributed to". As Ludwig AI confirms, using "attributed as" is a grammatical error that should be avoided. It's better to use alternatives like "credited to" or "ascribed to" to maintain grammatical accuracy. Despite its occasional use, adhering to standard English grammar by using "was attributed to" is recommended.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was credited to

Replaces "attributed as" with "credited to", emphasizing recognition for an achievement or contribution.

was ascribed to

Substitutes "attributed as" with "ascribed to", suggesting the assignment of a quality or characteristic.

was assigned as

Replaces "attributed as" with "assigned as", focusing on the act of giving a specific role or characteristic.

was considered to be

Changes the structure to emphasize consideration or belief about the cause or origin.

was deemed to be

Uses "deemed to be" to indicate a formal judgment or opinion regarding the cause.

was thought to be

Indicates a common belief or perception about the cause, rather than a direct attribution.

was recognized as

Emphasizes the recognition of a cause or characteristic by a wider audience.

stemmed from

Focuses on the origin or source of something, indicating a cause-and-effect relationship.

arose from

Similar to "stemmed from", but implies a more natural or spontaneous emergence.

resulted from

Highlights the outcome or consequence of a particular cause or factor.

FAQs

How to correctly use "attributed to" in a sentence?

Use "attributed to" when you want to credit something to a specific source or cause. For example, "The company's growth was attributed to its innovative marketing strategies."

What's the difference between "attributed to" and "credited to"?

"Attributed to" and "credited to" are often interchangeable, but "credited to" usually implies recognition for a specific achievement or contribution, while "attributed to" can refer to any cause or source.

Is it ever correct to use "attributed as"?

No, "attributed as" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. The correct phrasing is "attributed to". Ludwig AI also confirms this issue.

What are some alternatives to "attributed to"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "ascribed to", "assigned to", or "stemmed from".