was assumed by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was assumed by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to express that someone or something has taken on a role, responsibility, or ownership. For example: "The leadership of the project was assumed by Sarah."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Due diligence was assumed by both parties.

The Guardian - Sport

Germany's war strategy was assumed by Hitler from the first.

Britannica

In 2003 the post was assumed by Mariss Jansons.

Encyclopedia Britannica

It was assumed by these theories that people would sorry, it's the other one.

Cornell University

The leadership of the NMR Center was assumed by Dr. Bruce Rosen in 1998.

Harvard University

America's right to interfere in the election was assumed by all the participants.

The New York Times

It was assumed by all that I would eventually go to Harvard and become a professor".

The Guardian - Books

It was assumed by my family that I would get a Ph.D.

The New Yorker

I think it was assumed by the founders of this democracy that that was a given.

The New York Times

Responsibility for the School's educational program was assumed by the Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons in 1935.

Columbia University

The management of many companies was assumed by the state government.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Ensure the context provides clarity on why the assumption occurred, whether it was by delegation, natural progression, or necessity.

Common error

Avoid using "were assumed by" when the subject is singular. For example, say "The role was assumed by her" instead of "The role were assumed by her."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was assumed by" functions as a passive construction indicating the transfer of responsibility, power, or a particular role to a subject. As Ludwig AI confirms, this is a grammatically sound structure. For example, "Responsibility for repatriating the American films was assumed by the National Film Preservation Foundation."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Academia

25%

Encyclopedias

20%

Less common in

Science

15%

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was assumed by" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive construction that serves to indicate the transfer of responsibility, power, or roles. As validated by Ludwig AI, it commonly appears in neutral to formal contexts like news reporting, academic writing, and encyclopedic entries. When using this phrase, ensure subject-verb agreement and understand that it signifies a real transfer, not a presumption. Alternatives include "was taken over by" and "was shouldered by", offering subtle differences in meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was taken over by

Focuses on the act of taking control or responsibility, highlighting a transition of power.

was shouldered by

Focuses on the act of bearing a burden or responsibility.

was adopted by

Implies a deliberate choice to accept or embrace something.

was accepted by

Emphasizes agreement or approval regarding something.

was understood by

Highlights a shared comprehension or interpretation of something.

was shouldered with

Focuses on the act of bearing a burden or responsibility, suggesting the act of adding some tasks.

was received by

Highlights the manner in which something was greeted or acknowledged.

was believed by

Emphasizes a conviction or faith in something.

was presupposed by

Indicates something taken for granted or assumed as a necessary condition.

was borne by

Implies something was carried, either literally or figuratively.

FAQs

How can I use "was assumed by" in a sentence?

Use "was assumed by" to show that a role, responsibility, or power was taken on by someone or something. For example, "The debt "was assumed by the company" after the merger".

What's a good alternative to "was assumed by"?

Alternatives include "was taken over by", "was adopted by", or "was shouldered by", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "were assumed by" instead of "was assumed by"?

No, "were assumed by" is used with plural subjects, while "was assumed by" is used with singular subjects. For example, "Responsibilities were assumed by the team" is correct, but "Responsibility was assumed by the team" is also correct.

What's the difference between "was assumed by" and "was presumed by"?

"Was assumed by" indicates that something was actually taken on or adopted, whereas "was presumed by" means it was supposed or believed to be the case. They are not interchangeable.