Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was assigned with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was assigned with" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct usage would typically be "was assigned" or "was assigned to." Example: "He was assigned to the new project team to enhance collaboration."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Wiki
Alternative expressions(20)
was tasked with
was designated for
was assigned
was assigned to
was given the task of
was entrusted with
was appointed to
was delegated to
was charged with
was categorized with
was integrated with
was investigated with
was designated with
was ascribed with
was distinguished with
was attributed with
was ascertained with
was aligned with
was administered with
was allocated with
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
Dayne was assigned with replacing Barber.
News & Media
Lebovics spent most of his life as a Russian scholar, and after becoming a diplomat he was assigned, with the logic of foreign ministries worldwide, to two non-Russian-speaking countries: Israel and the Czech Republic.
News & Media
On Friday, Mr. Saeed was assigned with a half-dozen other rebels to guard the entrance to the refinery, where a liquefied petroleum gas tank has been ablaze for a week, sending thick plumes of smoke miles across the desert.
News & Media
One was assigned with unknown parity.
Each question was assigned with a designated score.
Each virtual module was assigned with physical properties such dimensions, shapes and positions.
Science
The first sub-channel is removed if it was assigned with a negative energy.
This results in a deviation of 13%, which was assigned with a yellow traffic light.
Each of them was assigned with names representing the purpose or goal of a particular stage.
Science
In FEA model, considering the scatter of the material's properties, each element was assigned with different material's properties.
The unmodeled density was assigned with assistance of the BALBES-MOLREP pipeline (Brown et al., 2015) and CXMS data.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use "was assigned" or "was assigned to" instead of "was assigned with". For example, instead of writing "The detective was assigned with the case", write "The detective was assigned the case" or "The detective was assigned to the case".
Common error
Avoid adding the preposition "with" after "assigned". This is a common mistake. The correct forms are "was assigned to" or simply "was assigned".
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was assigned with" functions as a passive construction where an individual or item receives a task or attribute. However, it is grammatically incorrect according to standard English usage. It should be noted that despite being incorrect, Ludwig provides multiple examples where the phrase is used.
Frequent in
Science
52%
News & Media
28%
Wiki
8%
Less common in
Formal & Business
6%
Reference
3%
Social Media
3%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
While the phrase "was assigned with" appears with some frequency, especially in scientific and news contexts, it is considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. Ludwig AI highlights the correct forms as either simply "was assigned" or "was assigned to". When writing, prioritize clarity and grammatical accuracy by using the correct forms. Although examples of "was assigned with" exist, adhering to standard grammatical rules ensures effective communication and enhances credibility.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was assigned
This is the grammatically correct and most direct alternative, omitting the unnecessary preposition.
was tasked with
Replaces "assigned" with "tasked", implying a specific duty or responsibility.
was designated for
Focuses on the purpose or intended use rather than the act of assignment.
was given the task of
Emphasizes the act of receiving a specific task.
was entrusted with
Highlights the aspect of trust and responsibility.
was appointed to
Suggests a formal selection or nomination for a role.
was delegated to
Implies that the task was passed down from a higher authority.
was commissioned to
Conveys a more official or formal assignment, often for a specific project.
had the responsibility of
Shifts the focus to the responsibility involved rather than the act of assigning.
was charged with
Indicates a formal or official assignment, often carrying significant responsibility.
FAQs
What is the correct way to use the phrase "assigned" in a sentence?
The correct usage is either "was assigned to" or simply "was assigned". For example, "He was assigned to the project" or "He was assigned the project" are both correct.
Is "was assigned with" grammatically correct?
No, "was assigned with" is not grammatically correct. The proper phrasing is either "was assigned" or "was assigned to".
What can I use instead of "was assigned with"?
You can use alternatives like "was tasked with", "was designated for", or simply "was assigned" depending on the context.
What's the difference between "was assigned to" and "was assigned with"?
"Was assigned to" is grammatically correct and means someone was given a duty or responsibility. "Was assigned with" is incorrect and should be avoided.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested