was as for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was as for" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It seems to be an incomplete or incorrect construction that lacks context for proper usage. Example: "The situation was as for the previous discussion, but it lacked clarity."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

41 human-written examples

It was, as for many in the crowd, her first protest.

The Guardian

One wonders whether a crack-up was, as for Fitzgerald, a creative necessity.

The New York Times - Books

But van Gogh is modern as much for what he was as for what he did.

The New York Times - Arts

My introduction to Tyler was, as for so many readers, "Dinner at the Homesick Restaurant".

The New York Times - Books

This was a Queen's speech as notable for the highlight that never was, as for its actual content.

The Guardian - Opinion

It was 2004 and we were coming to Paris as much for what it was as for what it wasn't.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

19 human-written examples

Asymptotically, that is, as, for every, (22).

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

All denotions are as for Fig. 3.

New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science

Light and temperature were as for previous experiments.

AMB Express

Subsequent care is as for new bulbs, as described above.

Wikipedia

Other stimulus and model parameters were as for Fig. 5A.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always double-check your sentence structure when you intend to express comparison or similarity. Alternatives such as "was the same as" or "mirrored" are preferable and convey a clearer relationship between the subjects.

Common error

A common mistake is to use "was as for" when attempting to draw a comparison. This construction is grammatically incorrect. Instead, clarify your comparison using phrases like "was similar to", "was just as", or rewrite the sentence for better clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was as for" functions as an attempted prepositional phrase aiming to establish a relationship or comparison between two elements. However, this construction is grammatically unsound and lacks clear meaning. Ludwig AI also indicates that the phrase is incorrect.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

30%

Wiki

30%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was as for" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in formal writing. As Ludwig AI indicates, this phrase does not convey a clear meaning. While examples can be found across various sources, including science, news, and wiki, its usage is inconsistent and often obscures the intended meaning of similarity, consistency, or purpose. Alternative phrases like "was similar to", "was consistent with", or "was in accordance with" provide clearer and more accurate ways to express these relationships.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was similar to

Replaces "as for" with "similar to", providing a direct comparison of similarity.

was in accordance with

Indicates that something was done following a specific guideline or instruction, replacing "as for" with a more formal phrase.

was consistent with

Suggests alignment or agreement with something else, offering a substitute for "as for" in contexts where consistency is key.

was applicable to

Implies that something was relevant or pertinent to a specific situation, replacing "as for" with a focus on applicability.

was designed for

Indicates the intended purpose or recipient of something, substituting "as for" with a focus on design.

was intended for

Focuses on the intended recipient, a subtle shift from similarity to purpose.

was used for

Highlights the purpose of something, differing from simple comparison.

was with regard to

Changes the focus to consideration or reference, broadening the context slightly.

was concerning

Shifts the context to what something is about, rather than a comparison.

was respecting

Indicates the consideration for someone or something and broadens the context.

FAQs

What are some correct alternatives to "was as for"?

Instead of "was as for", you can use phrases like "was similar to", "was consistent with", or "was in accordance with" depending on the context.

How can I rephrase a sentence that uses "was as for" to be more grammatically correct?

Identify the intended meaning – is it similarity, purpose, or another relationship? Then, replace "was as for" with a more appropriate phrase. For example, if you mean similarity, use "was the same as".

Is "was as for" considered grammatically correct in formal writing?

No, "was as for" is not considered grammatically correct. It's best to avoid this phrase in formal writing and opt for clearer alternatives.

What is the difference between "was as for" and "was regarding"?

"Was as for" is generally incorrect. "Was regarding" is a correct phrase used to indicate what something is about or concerning. Use "was regarding" when you want to indicate the subject matter.