Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was analyzed using
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was analyzed using" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something was examined in detail. For example: "The data collected from the experiment was analyzed using advanced statistical software."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Raw data was analyzed using Clampfit 10.4.
Science & Research
Variance was analyzed using an F-test.
Science & Research
The correlation coefficient was analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Science & Research
The headspace of the reaction was analyzed using GCMS.
Science & Research
Myelocytic metabolic activity was analyzed using immunohistochemical leukocyte POX staining.
Science & Research
Cluster enrichment was analyzed using DAVID (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/tools.jsp).jsp
Science & Research
Data was analyzed using the nSolver Analysis Software (NanoString Technologies).
Science & Research
MMNm was analyzed using equivalent current dipoles.
Science
It was analyzed using frequency and percentage.
Data was analyzed using framework content analysis.
Academia
The similarity of bounding boxes was analyzed using Dice coefficients.
Academia
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When describing analytical methods, be specific about the tools or techniques used after the phrase "was analyzed using". For example, "The data was analyzed using SPSS software" provides more clarity than simply saying "The data was analyzed".
Common error
Avoid using "was analyzed using" without specifying the analytical method. Saying "the sample was analyzed using advanced techniques" is less informative than "the sample was analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS)".
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was analyzed using" serves as a passive construction indicating that a subject underwent detailed examination through a specific method or tool. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and frequent usage in scientific and academic writing.
Frequent in
Science
95%
Academia
3%
Formal & Business
1%
Less common in
News & Media
0.5%
Encyclopedias
0.3%
Wiki
0.2%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "was analyzed using" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed phrase, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It is predominantly used in formal, especially scientific and academic writing, to clearly describe the methods employed in analyzing data or samples. To enhance clarity, it's crucial to specify the exact analytical techniques used. While alternatives exist, such as "was examined via" or "was assessed through", the core function remains the same: detailing the analytical process. This phrase helps maintain objectivity and precision in scholarly communication.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was examined via
Changes the preposition to 'via', implying a means or route of examination.
underwent analysis via
Shifts the focus to the subject experiencing analysis, using "via" instead of "using".
was investigated with
Substitutes "analyzed" with "investigated", suggesting a more exploratory approach, and "using" with "with".
was assessed through
Replaces "analyzed" with "assessed", focusing on evaluation, and "using" with "through", indicating a process.
was subjected to analysis through
Emphasizes that the subject was put through a process of analysis, replacing "using" with "through".
was evaluated by means of
Uses "evaluated" instead of "analyzed", highlighting judgment or appraisal, and replaces "using" with the more formal "by means of".
analysis was conducted with
Rephrases the sentence to emphasize the action of analysis, using "conducted with" instead of "analyzed using".
was determined by
Focuses on establishing or finding something out, rather than a detailed analysis.
examination was performed with
Similar to the previous example, but uses "examination" instead of "analysis", suggesting a closer inspection.
was processed with
Suggests a transformation or manipulation rather than a detailed examination.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "was analyzed using" to sound more formal?
For a more formal tone, consider alternatives such as "was evaluated by means of" or "was subjected to analysis through". These options add a layer of professional precision to your writing.
Is it grammatically correct to say "was analyzed utilizing" instead of "was analyzed using"?
Yes, "was analyzed utilizing" is grammatically correct, with "'utilizing'" simply being a synonym for 'using'. However, stick to 'using' unless there's a good reason to use the more formal 'utilizing'.
What's the difference between "was analyzed using" and "was interpreted with"?
"Was analyzed using" implies a systematic examination, often involving specific tools or methods. "Was interpreted with", on the other hand, suggests that understanding or meaning was derived using a particular framework or perspective. For example, "Data was analyzed using statistical software" versus "Results were interpreted with a feminist lens".
Can I use "was analyzed by" instead of "was analyzed using"?
Yes, "was analyzed by" is grammatically correct. However, it typically refers to who performed the analysis (e.g., "was analyzed by a team of experts"), while "was analyzed using" refers to the method or tool employed (e.g., "was analyzed using mass spectrometry").
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested