was also

USAGE SUMMARY

"was also" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something is true in addition to something previously mentioned. For example: "John went to the store, and Mary was also there."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

She was 41; Yeats was 43.

Independent

He was 14; she was 21.

The New York Times - Arts

Cynthia was 6 and Meg was 3 1/2.

The New Yorker

She was 13; he was 15.

The New York Times

She was 47, Willie was 41.

The New York Times

She was 20, and he was 21.

The New York Times

I was 19 and he was 16.

The Guardian - Film

She was 24 and I was 12.

The New York Times - Magazine

Captain Booter was 22; Alex was 19.

The New Yorker

Price was 19-6, and Sabathia was 21-7.

The New York Times - Sports

The year was 2009; she was 84.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was also" to smoothly integrate additional information or details that complement the main subject of your sentence. This helps maintain a cohesive and flowing narrative.

Common error

Avoid starting multiple consecutive sentences with "was also", as it can make your writing sound repetitive. Instead, try incorporating synonyms like "in addition" or restructuring your sentences to vary the phrasing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was also" functions as a conjunction or linking phrase, used to introduce additional information or a related detail in a sentence. Ludwig confirms that it is correct and usable in written English. It serves to connect two or more ideas, indicating that something is true or applicable in addition to what has already been stated.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was also" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that serves to introduce additional, related information. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct and usable in written English. It's particularly common in news and media contexts, as well as scientific and formal business writing. While versatile, writers should avoid overuse to prevent repetition and maintain a varied writing style. Consider using synonyms like "in addition", "as well", or restructuring sentences for better flow. By understanding its function and context, you can effectively incorporate "was also" to enhance clarity and depth in your communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

also was

Inversion of the words "was also".

too was

Uses "too" instead of "also", offering a more concise alternative.

in addition was

Replaces "also" with the phrase "in addition", providing a slightly more formal tone.

as well was

Replaces "also" with "as well", maintaining similar meaning and formality.

furthermore was

A more formal way of adding information, suggesting a continuation of the previous point.

moreover was

Similar to "furthermore", offering a formal means of adding related details.

similarly was

Introduces a sense of similarity alongside the addition.

likewise was

Implies that the added element is comparable or analogous to something already mentioned.

besides was

Indicates that the information is being added as an additional consideration.

equally was

Highlights that the added information carries the same weight or importance as the previous information.

FAQs

How can I use "was also" in a sentence?

Use "was also" to add information about something that is true in addition to a previously stated fact. For example, "John went to the store, and Mary "also was" there."

What are some alternatives to "was also"?

You can use alternatives such as "in addition", "as well", or "too", depending on the context. For instance, instead of "He was tired and he was also hungry", you could say "He was tired and, "in addition", hungry."

Is it grammatically correct to start a sentence with "was also"?

While grammatically correct, starting a sentence with "was also" is generally discouraged in formal writing. It's better to integrate it within the sentence to maintain flow and avoid abruptness.

What's the difference between "was also" and "also was"?

"Was also" is the standard word order for adding information. "Also was" is less common and may sound awkward unless used in specific constructions, such as questions or emphatic statements.