was affixed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was affixed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that has been attached or secured to a surface or object in the past. Example: "The label was affixed to the package before it was shipped."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

was affixed here.

The New York Times - Travel

The wrench was affixed to a bridge bolt.

The New York Times

One of his posters was affixed to a utility box.

The Guardian

NMR and atomic absorption analysis confirmed the hyaluronan was affixed with dendrimers or pN.

Acta Biomaterialia

The injury required surgery, and a metal plate was affixed to the bone to stabilize it.

The New York Times - Sports

That year, a bronze plaque inscribed with "The New Colossus" was affixed to the statue's base.

The Washington Post

After fabrication, a polystyrene cylinder was affixed over the MEA to enable cell culturing.

Nature

A large "Hogan for Governor" banner was affixed at the entrance.

The Washington Post

A white box, I saw, was affixed to many of the light posts.

The Guardian - Opinion

He had an empty camouflage drop holster that was affixed to his right thigh".

The New York Times

A pin bearing the American and Vatican flags was affixed to his lapel.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was affixed" when you want to convey a sense of formal attachment or precise placement. It's particularly suitable for technical or descriptive writing where accuracy is important.

Common error

Avoid using "was affixed" in casual conversation or informal writing. Simpler alternatives like "was attached" or "was put on" are often more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was affixed" functions as a passive voice construction of the verb "affix". It indicates that something (the subject) had something attached to it, or has been attached to it by an external agent or force. Ludwig examples show it describing a wide range of attachments, from plaques to metal plates.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

38%

Academia

14%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was affixed" is a grammatically sound and relatively common passive construction used to describe something that has been attached or secured. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is valid. While it is most frequently encountered in scientific and news contexts, it is essential to consider the register of your writing, as more common alternatives like "was attached" may be more appropriate in informal settings. When aiming for precision and a touch of formality, "was affixed" is an excellent choice.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was attached

A more common and general alternative, suitable for most contexts where "was affixed" is used.

was secured

Implies a more firm or stable attachment than "was affixed".

was fastened

Similar to "was secured", but often suggests a mechanical means of attachment.

was joined

Indicates a connection between two or more things, rather than a simple attachment to a surface.

was connected

Similar to "was joined", emphasizing the link or relationship created by the attachment.

was fixed

Suggests a permanent or unmoving attachment.

was adhered

Implies attachment through a sticky substance or surface tension.

was applied

Suggests the act of putting something onto a surface, which then becomes attached.

was mounted

Implies attachment to a support or structure, often in a prominent or visible way.

was coupled

Indicates that two or more things have been linked or connected

FAQs

How can I use "was affixed" in a sentence?

Use "was affixed" to describe something that has been attached or secured to a surface. For example, "The label was affixed to the package."

What can I say instead of "was affixed"?

You can use alternatives like "was attached", "was secured", or "was fastened" depending on the context.

Is "was affixed" more formal than "was attached"?

Yes, "was affixed" is generally considered more formal than "was attached". Use "was affixed" in technical or formal writing, while "was attached" is suitable for most contexts.

When is it appropriate to use "was affixed"?

It's appropriate when you want to emphasize the precise or deliberate nature of the attachment. It is often used in technical descriptions, legal documents, or formal reports.