was admitted for

USAGE SUMMARY

"was admitted for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase to describe a situation in which someone is taken in or allowed to enter a place, organization, or activity. For example, "The student was admitted for an advanced course in mathematics."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He was admitted for more tests.

The New York Times

She was admitted for three months and underwent seven surgeries.

The Guardian

The young man was admitted for further evaluation.

The New York Times - Magazine

A man from Florida was admitted for throat cancer surgery.

The New York Times

In September, he was admitted for treatment of anemia.

The New York Times

Last September, he was admitted for treatment of anemia.

The New York Times

He was admitted for treatment at a psychiatric hospital.

Independent

She was admitted for observation and hooked up to machines that monitored her vital signs.

MIT Technology Review

"Suffice it to say I was admitted for other reasons," Ms. Wurtzel said.

The New York Times

But then he broke down again and was admitted for six weeks and put on Largactyl.

The Guardian

On Wednesday, Ms. Lanoux was admitted for her eighth cycle of biochemotherapy.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was admitted for", ensure the reason for admission is clear and specific. For instance, instead of saying "He was admitted for treatment", specify "He was admitted for treatment of pneumonia".

Common error

Avoid using "was admitted for" without specifying the reason. Saying "She was admitted for observation" is less informative than "She was admitted for observation after a head injury".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was admitted for" functions as a passive construction, indicating the reason or purpose for someone's admission to a hospital or institution. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

37%

News & Media

34%

Formal & Business

29%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was admitted for" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to denote the reason for someone's admission to a healthcare facility or institution. Ludwig AI validates its correctness and prevalent application across diverse sources. It's commonly found in scientific, news, and business contexts. Ensure clarity by specifying the exact reason for admission and avoiding vagueness. The phrase serves to inform readers precisely why someone was admitted, fulfilling an essential communicative function in both medical and administrative reporting.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was hospitalized for

Replaces "admitted" with a synonym emphasizing hospital care.

was taken in for

Uses a more general term for acceptance or care.

was entered for

Focuses on the act of being entered into a program or institution.

received treatment for

Highlights the medical aspect of admission.

was accepted to

Emphasizes acceptance into an academic or professional setting.

was registered for

Focuses on the act of being officially enrolled or signed up.

was processed for

Highlights the administrative aspect of admission.

underwent assessment for

Focuses on the evaluation process during admission.

was confined for

Emphasizes restriction or containment due to admission.

sought care for

Highlights the patient's initiative in seeking medical attention.

FAQs

How to use "was admitted for" in a sentence?

Use "was admitted for" to indicate the reason someone was taken into a hospital or institution. For example, "The patient "was admitted for surgery"".

What can I say instead of "was admitted for"?

You can use alternatives like "was hospitalized for", "received treatment for", or "was taken in for" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "was admitted for" or "was admitted because of"?

"Was admitted for" is generally used to specify the condition or reason, while "was admitted because of" emphasizes the cause leading to the admission. Both can be correct, but "was admitted for" is more concise in most medical contexts.

What's the difference between "was admitted for" and "was discharged after"?

"Was admitted for" indicates the reason for hospital entry, while "was discharged after" indicates the condition or procedure following which the patient left the hospital. They represent opposite phases of a hospital stay.