was additional

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was additional" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was extra or supplementary in a past context. Example: "The report indicated that there was additional funding available for the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

There was additional intrigue.

The New York Times - Sports

It was additional shooting, not re-shooting".

The New York Times

There was additional music for one song by Ron Wood.

The New York Times

The current trial, he said, was additional evidence.

The New York Times

Then at the bottom was additional information: "65 calories".

The New York Times

There was additional fallout from the game Saturday.

The New York Times - Sports

I thought it was additional perfume or that was the style of Indian soap".

The Guardian

There was additional outrage at the staggering 2.5bn franc bill for the work – around €75bn today.

The Guardian

There was additional choreography by Maria Alba, Mieko Sieto, Elena Andujar and Masahiro Kunii.

The New York Times

Fisher said Calico would be out 8 to 10 weeks or more if there was additional damage.

The New York Times - Sports

There was additional choreography by Anup Kumar Das and Pallavi Raisurana, as well as improvisations by the dancers.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was additional", ensure that the context clearly indicates what is being added to. For example, "There was additional information included in the report" clearly specifies that information is being added.

Common error

Be careful not to use "was additional" in a way that is redundant. For instance, avoid saying "There was additional extra information," as "additional" already implies that it's extra.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was additional" functions as a linking verb followed by an adjective, indicating that something existed as an addition or supplement to something else. Ludwig AI confirms this usage through numerous examples across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

41%

Science

38%

Wiki

6%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was additional" is a grammatically correct and very common phrase used to indicate that something existed as an addition or supplement. Ludwig AI's analysis of numerous examples demonstrates its frequent usage across news, scientific, and general contexts. While it maintains a neutral formality level, it’s essential to use it in a way that's clear and not redundant. Remember to consider context and purpose when selecting alternatives such as "was supplementary" or "provided further".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was supplementary

Highlights the supportive or enhancing nature of something added.

provided further

Indicates that more of something was supplied or given.

constituted an addition

Emphasizes the act of adding something to a pre-existing state or amount.

included more

Focuses on the incorporation of additional elements.

involved a supplement

Focuses on the inclusion of something that completes or enhances.

represented an increase

Highlights the growth or augmentation of something.

offered extra

Suggests that something more was provided beyond the usual.

featured the inclusion of

Highlights that additional aspects or components were present or involved.

was coupled with

Indicates that something was joined or linked to something else, adding to it.

entailed an augmentation

Emphasizes the process of enlarging or increasing something.

FAQs

How can I use "was additional" in a sentence?

You can use "was additional" to indicate that something extra or supplementary existed. For example, "The report indicated that there was additional funding available for the project".

What are some alternatives to "was additional"?

Alternatives to "was additional" include "was supplementary", "provided further", or "constituted an addition", depending on the specific context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "was additional"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct to use "was additional" to describe something that existed in addition to something else.

What's the difference between "was additional" and "was extra"?

"Was additional" and "was extra" are quite similar, but "was additional" might sound slightly more formal. Both indicate that something more existed, but the choice depends on the desired tone.