Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Analysis of this regression model (R2 = 0.33) revealed that neither weight nor height was a significant coefficient, contributing to the model (t = -1.4, p = 0.16 and t = -0.98, p = 0.33 for weight and height respectively).
Similar(59)
P for poly dG.dC tracts does not correlate with nucleotide composition, and whilst there is a significant coefficient of correlation between P and length of intergenic regions, the negligible elevation of the slope suggests P is largely independent of length of the upstream and downstream proximal intergenic sequences investigated here.
In the present study, there was a significant correlation coefficient between plasma miR-124-5p miR-124-5p miR-124-5pxpression levels (Fig. 3).
In the present study, there was a significant correlation coefficients between plasma miR-124-5p miR-124-5p miR-124-5pxpression levels (Fig. 3. Univandate analysis: r = 0.451, 95% conFFPEnce miR-124-5p miR-124-5p miR-124-5p02).
Baseline blood pressure was not a significant coefficient.
For the sadness rating, in the first step of the regression analysis, there was not a significant coefficient for change in sadness, β = 0.23, t(43) = 1.58, p =.12.
There was a significant correlation (correlation coefficient value reached 0.41, P < 0.01) between the expression levels of ZmNAC1 and the lateral root number phenotype of the RILs, illustrating that ZmNAC1 is important for maize lateral root development.
Definition 3. If a wavelet coefficient at the coarsest scale satisfy, for a given threshold T, then is called a significant coefficient.
There was a significant positive correlation (r) coefficient at P ≤ 0.01 between growth on one side and the production of inulinase (r = 0.98) and invertase (r = 0.99) on the other side.
Publication bias was considered present if there was a significant non-zero slope coefficient, (p < 0.10), suggesting that only the small studies reporting a high sensitivity with CAD had been published, whereas the small studies reporting a lower sensitivity had not been published.
Through a regression analysis, Bansback et al. [ 24] suggested that the HAQ disability index was a significant predictor of EQ-5D (coefficient −0.31, p < 0.05).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com