Sentence examples for vs visit from inspiring English sources

In the ROC analysis performed in the overall population, both DRIN greater than −4.55 % or PWV greater than 8.50 m/s were able to predict MA development with a good sensitivity and specificity (Table  3).> -wrap-foot> > *p < 0.05 vs No MA group #p < 0.05 vs Visit 0 We performed an explorative subgroup analysis in T2DM and EH separately (Table  4).

As expected, correlations between paired measurements (i.e. visit 1 vs visit 2; visit 2 vs visit 3) were statistically significant (p < 0.05) and moderate to high in strength ('r' ranging from 0.22 to 0.87).

Although the observed LOD ratios between SHAVE vs Average were modest when compared with Average vs single visit, the ratios were all greater than one, indicating a consistent increase in power of SHAVE relative to Average.

When comparing Average vs single visit, we show the expected LOD ratio as a function of the number of visits and the correlation between visits.

After matching, schizophrenia caregivers reported a greater number of health care provider visits (8.0 vs 5.7), ER visits (0.9 vs 0.2), and hospitalizations (0.8 vs 0.1) than noncaregivers, all P<0.001.

After matching, schizophrenia caregivers reported greater activity impairment (38.4% vs 26.1%), provider visits (8.0 vs 5.7), emergency room visits (0.9 vs 0.2), hospitalizations (0.8 vs 0.1), and direct costs (€2,258 vs €617) than noncaregivers, all P<0.001.

The mean total number of outpatient visits declined from pre-surgery to follow-up (18.0 visits vs 17.1), while the percentage of patients hospitalized increased (from 7.5%to9.8.8%) (both p < 0.01).

In the filtering process, we visit VS-tree from the root and judge whether the visited nodes are candidates.

Body weight did not change during the trial (baseline vs third inpatient study visit, 83.1 ± 3.1 kg vs 83.2 ± 3.1 kg, p = 0.88).

Teenagers made a good mean number of antenatal clinic visits (16.4 vs 16.5), but were more likely to have attended fewer than half of the recommended visits (3% (n=210) vs 1.4% (n=716)).

Paired comparisons between outcome measures obtained during the first and second inpatients visits (i.e. Baseline vs. IDV Condition) and during the second and third inpatient visits (IDV vs IDV + AG) were made using a paired t-test.