Sentence examples for volume trial from inspiring English sources

However, post hoc analyses of patients enrolled in two participating centers of the original low tidal volume trial did not detect differences in the dose or duration of sedatives and opioids between low tidal volume and control groups [2],[3].

For example, in the ARDSNet trials involving critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation (Low Tidal Volume Trial and the Fluids and Catheter Treatment Trial), approximately 1% of research subjects were deemed competent to provide their own consent.

The Low-Tidal Volume trial (table 5) shows a current probability of 83% (enthusiastic) or 65% (mild skeptic) for the physician who is looking for a RRR>15%.

Even though the ARDSNet Low-Tidal Volume trial [5] was not specifically designed for patients with severe sepsis, we included it because approximately 60% of the trial population had sepsis or pneumonia, and the trial results have been recommended for patients with severe sepsis by practice guidelines [7].

The Acute Respiratory Distress Network (ARDSNet) low tidal volume trial [ 23] generated controversy in defining the comparator [ 24, 25].

However, greater extremes of HA than seen in the ARDS Network low vs. high tidal volume trial will likely be needed in order to see a benefit.

Chemical tracers (sulphur hexafluoride, SF6; krypton, Kr; perdeuterated methane, CD4) were added on the basis of literature surveys and small volume trials at the Frio II Brine experiment in Texas.

If we analyze them with the mild skepticism, only the Intensive Insulin, rhAPC, and Low-Tidal Volume trials show beneficial results.

Answer 1-The analysis based on mild skeptic prior shows beneficial results with the Intensive Insulin, rhAPC, and Low-Tidal Volume trials, but not with the Low-Dose Steroid and EGDT trials.

90 The significance of single session completion is reflected by its regular reporting as an important outcome in large volume trials while the ACE study demonstrated significantly lower treatment success with previously attempted lesions (75.4%) than with treatment-naïve lesions (91%) (OR=3.75, 95% CI 1.77 to 7.94, p=0.01).

The trial was over more than a year ago, and the 13-volume trial transcript is public and available on the Internet.