Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(31)
Health facility visits increased from 12,270 in 2008 involving 8,261 individuals to 168,602 in 2010 involving 108,124 individuals.
From 1997 through 2006, the number of ED visits increased from 94.9 million to 119.2 million, representing an increase of 24percentt [9].
During the 4-year study period, the number of visits increased from 53,660 (January 2008 to December 2009) in the casualty room to 77,164 (February 2010 to January 2012) in the new ED.
Similarly, the number of abdominal MRIs per 1,000 ED visits increased from 0 to 1.0 (p < 0.0001), and the number of abdominal sonographs per 1,000 ED visits increased 51.6% (p = 0.0198).
Similarly, the number of abdominal MRIs per 1,000 ED visits increased from 0 in 1990 to 1.0 in 2009 (p < 0.0001) and the number of abdominal sonography examinations per 1,000 ED visits increased 51.6%, from 27 to 41 (p = 0.0198).
The average mean number of DW visits for symptomatic non-AIDS patients remained constant at 0.7 PPY, while for AIDS patients the average mean DW visits increased from 1.5 in 1997 to 2.0 PPY in 2006, having first decreased to 0.6 in 2000 (Figure 3).
Similar(29)
In this study, women's use of antenatal services increased considerably over the course of the 3-year MNCH intervention, with the number of women receiving 3 or more ANC visits increasing from 40%to81%1%.
The average amount dog owners spent out of pocket on a vet visit increased from $196 to $263 during the same period.
The number of patients who had a physician office visit increased from 54 to 67 after joining the program.
The proportion of COT patients with a documented assessment of functional status increased from 33% to 46% and those with a behavioral health visit increased from 24%to28%8%.
OOPE incurred during the last outpatient visit increased from INR 272.1 (95% CI = 249.0-295.2) in respondents with no NCDs to INR 454.1 (95% CI = 407.8-500.4) in respondents with ≥2 NCDs.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com