Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
95.5% of practice nurses felt confident compared with 53% of district nurses and 44% of health visitors (p < 0.01).
96% of practice nurses were confident at in using computerised medical records, compared with 53% of district nurses and 44% of health visitors (p < 0.01).
However, the average CC16 levels in pool visitors both before (S1) and after (S2) exercise were lower than in non-pool visitors (p < 0.01) (Table 2).
GPs were less confident about giving advice about infant feeding than health visitors (p = 0.001) and nursery nurses (p = 0.009) but more knowledgeable about the health risks of obesity (p < 0.001) than nurses (p = 0.009).
MC visitors were older (P = 0.008) and had a lower level of education (P < 0.001), but they had better knowledge of the availability of microscopy service than non MC visitors (P < 0.001).
Most primary care nurses (89%) use their computer regularly at work: 100% of practice nurses daily, compared with 60% of district nurses and 59% of health visitors (p < 0.01).
Similar(54)
The α value for significance was adjusted to account for testing multiple visitor center cities (p = 0.05/14 visitor center cities = 0.0036).
Nursery nurses (Fisher exact probability = 0.009) and health visitors (χ(1) 26.35, p < 0.001) were significantly more likely to have been consulted at least weekly compared to other professions.
However, when CC16 after exercise (S2) was considered, there was a tendency toward a correlation in non-pool visitors after exercise (p < 0.06) (Table 3, Figure 1).
Using linear regression, we found no evidence that plots were influenced by their neighbors with respect to the abundance of flower visitors (F 1,63) = 1.23, p = 0.223).
Access to IT was not significantly different between different age groups; but 91% of practice nurses had their own computer while many district nurses and health visitors had to share (p < 0.01).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com