In the last-visit analysis of EQ-5D index scores, temsirolimus was associated with superior EQ-5D index scores compared with IFN- α.
In a corresponding (last-visit) analysis of EQ-VAS scores, temsirolimus was associated with superior EQ-VAS scores compared with IFN- α.
A by-visit analysis of the least squares (LS) mean changes for the WMTB-C revealed a statistically significantly greater improvement at the last week for patients with ADHD over the ADHD+D group on the CE standard (p =.003) and component scores (p =.012; Figure 3).
In the last-visit analysis of mean EQ-VAS scores, scores were significantly higher in the temsirolimus arm compared with the IFN- α arm among patients with no prior nephrectomy (P=0.0056) or with clear-cell histology (P=0.0061), and/or at least three poor-prognostic factors (P=0.0056).
We compared the sample of included patients (n = 641) and those subjects who were missing an important covariate (n = 31) and found no significant differences in gender, years of education, age, or number of clinic visits (analysis not reported).
ANC coverage: four or more visits (Analysis 2.1) - one trial (Wahlstrom 2011) had a considerably larger effect size than the others, and we considered this trial to be of high risk of bias due to questions about analysis methods in the trial.
At the initial visit, OCT analysis revealed a raised RPE-choriocapillaris complex consistent with a raised choroidal lesion at the initial visit.
(PDF 853 kb) Additional file 3: a Cross-sectional associations between serum tenascin-C levels and positivity of anti-ds-DNA antibodies at the inception visit (univariate analysis).
When comparing HIV-related characteristics at the initial evaluation visit, the analysis was restricted to children with confirmed (≥18 months old) or presumed (<18 months old) infection.
b Cross-sectional associations between serum tenascin-C levels and positivity of anti-nucleosome antibodies at the inception visit (univariate analysis).
While many entries were recorded at the time of the patient visit, close analysis revealed that there was a flurry of data entry immediately preceding each OSCE, and that many of these entries were delayed relative to the patient visit.
