Similar(60)
We used a general linear model with body ownership and body size as within-subjects factors and body visibility and fixation as between-subjects factors.
We used a general linear model in which body ownership and body size were defined as within-subjects factors and body visibility and fixation were defined as between-subjects factors.
Comparing the results of these two experiments with those of the previous study (van der Hoort et al., 2011) through a meta-analysis allows us to assess the relative contribution of body visibility and fixation in the own-body-size effect and, thus, disentangles the familiar-size cue hypothesis from the rescaling hypothesis.
Finally, we performed a combined analysis of Experiment 1a, Experiment 2, and a previously published experiment (Experiment 6 in van der Hoort et al., 2011) to isolate the effects of body size, body ownership, body visibility, and fixation across different experiments.
Specifically, on each trial of this visibility test, participants first saw a fixation cross (1,000 ms).
The effect of fixation on the effect of body visibility (body size × body visibility × fixation ) could not be assessed with certainty because the analysis did not include a "fixation, no body occlusion" condition.
Suboptimal levels of tissue fixation lead to disruption and loss of visibility of mitotic figures, one of the three variables assessed in NGS.
We encountered a relatively low visibility rate compared to other studies, because we used a biologically resorbable fixation screw, which is not radio-opaque.
Consequently, when words in Latinate languages are displayed to the left and right of fixation in experiments, beginning letters are closer to fixation when displayed to the right and the difference this causes in the visibility of beginning letter information may help produce a LH advantage (for further discussion, see [41]).
More importantly, this left-right difference in beginning letter visibility between the two visual hemifields would be greater for stimuli further from fixation, and this may explain why LH advantages observed previously for words in extrafoveal locations have not also been observed in foveal locations [29], [30].
Note visibility.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com