Suggestions(1)
Exact(4)
The GHI spacers known to be found in oral species of Gemella and the VSI spacers found in oral species of Veillonella had many fewer spacers matching oral viruses when compared to streptococcal spacers.
Cecilia et al. report a sensitivity of 100% for DENV and 95.8% for CHIKV, while the specificity was 100% for both viruses when compared to conventional RT-PCR [ 24].
Taken together these results support a model where the IFITM123 protein family and RIG-I all play a crucial role in the tolerance of ducks to highly pathogenic and low pathogenic strains of avian influenza viruses when compared to the chicken.
Taken together these results support a model where the IFITM123 family and RIG-I play a crucial role in the tolerance of ducks to high and low pathogenic strains of avian influenza viruses when compared to the chicken and other Galliformes.
Similar(56)
Lungs of Ceacam1−/− mice contained significantly less lytic virus when compared to WT mice (Fig. 1A).
Significantly higher transgene expression was observed 24h after injection CaGl with virus when compared to virus only (Fig. 5e).
Similar analysis showed 17 amino acid substitutions throughout the genome and one deletion in the NA stalk region in the QA23CkA10 virus when compared to the WT702 virus.
As in the kinetic experiment, lungs of Ceacam1−/− mice contained significantly less lytic virus when compared to WT mice (Fig. 1B).
The small reduction is most likely due to a slightly lower number of repeat units present in the revertant virus when compared to the parental virus (see Fig. 1B).
Comparative sequence analysis revealed 14 amino acid substitutions throughout the genome and one deletion in the NA stalk region in the QA23 virus when compared to the WT702 virus.
Although soluble flagellin also induced enhanced antibody responses (HAI titers) to the homologous H1 virus when compared to standard VLPs, the enhancement of HAI titers to a heterologous H3 virus was not significant.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com