violent conflict

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "violent conflict" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation where there is physical aggression or hostility between groups or individuals, often resulting in harm or destruction. Example: "The region has been plagued by violent conflict for decades, leading to a humanitarian crisis."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"There was a violent conflict between them.

Independent

"A violent conflict is like a fire.

The New York Times

Violent conflict exacerbates this reality.

The Guardian

Violent conflict has taken a particularly heavy toll.

The Guardian

The Soviet people destroyed the Soviet Union, not outsiders, and not through violent conflict.

The New York Times

You can rig up a moral-equivalence argument for any violent conflict.

The New Yorker

But it has also produced anxiety, stress and even violent conflict.

The New York Times

And yet, neither trade wars nor arms races necessarily end in violent conflict.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The turmoil comes as the government is locked in a violent conflict with Maoist rebels.

The New York Times

Some said it was wrong to transform a violent conflict into a sellable spectacle.

The Guardian

Although the protesters caught the country's attention, the violent conflict between the Palestinians and Israelis continued.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a situation involving physical force and aggression, use "violent conflict" to accurately convey the intensity and potential harm.

Common error

Avoid using "violent conflict" in overly passive constructions that obscure the actors and actions involved. Instead of saying "There was a violent conflict", specify who initiated the violence and what actions occurred to create a clearer and more impactful statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "violent conflict" functions primarily as a noun phrase where the adjective 'violent' modifies the noun 'conflict'. It describes a situation characterized by physical aggression, hostility, and potential harm. Ludwig provides numerous examples illustrating its use across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

46%

Science

32%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "violent conflict" is a commonly used and grammatically correct phrase that effectively describes situations involving physical aggression and hostility. Ludwig AI affirms its validity and widespread use across various contexts, particularly in news, scientific, and formal business settings. Related phrases like "armed conflict" or "hostile confrontation" offer alternative ways to express similar concepts, each with subtle nuances. When using this phrase, avoid passive voice constructions and ensure clarity in identifying the actors and actions involved.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

armed conflict

Focuses specifically on the use of weapons and military force.

hostile confrontation

Emphasizes the antagonistic nature of the encounter.

military engagement

Highlights the structured and organized aspect of the violence.

warlike clashes

Suggests a series of battles or skirmishes typical of war.

aggressive hostilities

Stresses the intentional and forceful initiation of conflict.

combative situation

Describes a general state of readiness for fighting.

belligerent actions

Focuses on the actions that demonstrate a willingness to fight.

contentious warfare

Highlights the disputed or controversial nature of the conflict.

brutal clashes

Emphasizes the ruthlessness and severity of the confrontations.

ferocious aggression

Underscores the intensity and unrestrained nature of the violence.

FAQs

What is a good substitute for "violent conflict"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "armed conflict", "hostile confrontation", or "military engagement" to convey a similar meaning.

How does "violent conflict" differ from "disagreement"?

"Violent conflict" implies physical aggression and harm, whereas "disagreement" refers to a difference of opinion or perspective without the use of force.

Is it appropriate to use "violent conflict" in academic writing?

Yes, "violent conflict" is appropriate for academic writing when discussing topics related to war, political science, sociology, and other relevant fields. Ensure the term is used accurately and supported by evidence.

What are the primary causes of "violent conflict"?

The causes of "violent conflict" are multifaceted and can include political instability, economic inequality, ethnic tensions, and resource scarcity, among other factors.