Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(9)
To examine factors related to violence type, four groups based on participants' reports of violence toward others were created: no violence (46.8%), partner violence only (17.3%), non-partner violence only (20.2%), and both partner and non-partner violence (15.7%).
An experimental study was designed with the aim of knowing the effects of the subjective perception of partner violence victimization (yes vs. no), gender (male vs. female), and psychological violence type (subtle vs. overt) on objective partner violence victimization; the evaluation of the observed degree of violence, the adult attachment and on the conflict resolution tactics.
For each dating violence type, subjects who responded with "yes" were considered exposed to that dating violence type.
Dating violence was commonly experienced as 2 to 5 occurrences of each dating violence type.
Then, for each dating violence type, we asked about the number of occurrences, number of abusive partners, and age at first occurrence.
In gender-stratified analyses, we estimated overall dating violence prevalence (exposure was defined as a response of "yes" to any of the eight dating violence questions in Table 1), and then prevalence of each of the eight dating violence types (response of "yes" to each respective dating violence type signified exposure to that dating violence type).
Similar(51)
Some dating violence types tended to occur at earlier ages than other dating violence types.
For most other dating violence types, between 16% and 30% of victimization began before age 15.
Specifically, our study includes an expanded assessment of how dating violence types relate to health in late adolescence, including dating violence types that are relevant to today's adolescents [ 22].
A range of violence types, perpetrators and contexts were described by participants and presented in further detail below.
However, of note, roughly 15% of females and males reported 20 or more occurrences of some dating violence types.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com