Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
The relationship between perceived trust in scientists and the discrepancies of risk perception does seem to suggest that scientists who feel trusted also tend to have positive views of risk perception.
Very little targeted research has been undertaken on differing stakeholder views of risk perception with regard to nanotechnology.
The struggles over the distribution of risks are a major reason for the differences in the scientific or expert views of risk and the views of different sections of society.
There were interesting and previously unreported differences in public views of risk factors for each disorder studied, with genetic factors rated as most important in autism but psychosocial factors predominating in bipolar disorders and substance misuse more often rated as a risk factor for schizophrenia.
And a recent qualitative study of 46 investigator's experiences of RECs in the U.S. (termed institutional review boards, or IRBs) noted that: 'Most investigators expressed concerns that differing views of risk as well as logistical variations across IRBs discouraged multi-site research at a time when large samples are needed to advance science' [ 35].
Knowledge items (n = 8) included the following- views of the likely prevalence of mental disorders in the general population, causal attributions (eg views of risk factors such as genetic vulnerability, external stressors, etc)., beliefs about controllability (by the individual themselves or via different treatments), beliefs about stability and predictability.
Similar(52)
First, very little targeted research has been undertaken on differing stakeholder views of risks from nanotechnology.
Consequently they sometimes generalised from their experience of prescribing and withdrawing patients from benzodiazepines, to assume what patients' views of risks and benefits would be - an example of Kahneman's 'representativeness' heuristic [ 34].
The first is to take a broader view of risk.
What is needed is a broader view of risk.
"It tends to impose a more balanced view of risk," Professor Sanders said.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com