viewed with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "viewed with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a feeling or opinion that someone has of something. For example: His latest project was viewed with skepticism by his peers.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

China is almost universally viewed with despair.

The Economist

Outsiders were viewed with suspicion.

The Guardian - Opinion

In Broadcasting House, the criticisms are viewed with frustration.

Independent

High salaries are viewed with suspicion.

The New York Times

But Brussels is certainly not viewed with great affection.

The Guardian

That which cannot be measured is viewed with suspicion.

The Guardian

But it needs to be viewed with considerable caution.

The Guardian - Tech

Such friendliness is still viewed with some suspicion.

The New York Times

At home the agency is viewed with awe and dread.

The Guardian

A Japanese newcomer with a camera was viewed with suspicion.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

We viewed the situation with alarm.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "viewed with" to clearly express an opinion, feeling, or perspective that someone holds about a particular subject. This construction adds depth to your writing by highlighting the subjective nature of perception.

Common error

Ensure that the subject doing the "viewing" is clear to avoid ambiguity. Vague phrasing can make it difficult for readers to understand who holds the perspective being described.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "viewed with" functions as a verb phrase, specifically a passive construction, where something is being observed or considered through a particular lens or emotion. Ludwig AI shows this phrase frequently used to add a subjective element to observations.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

7%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "viewed with" is a versatile and commonly used construction to express subjective perspectives across various contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct and frequently encountered in both news and scientific writing. It's important to ensure clarity by specifying who is doing the viewing and to avoid ambiguity in your writing. Whether it's "viewed with suspicion" or "viewed with optimism", this phrase adds depth to your descriptions, highlighting the emotional or intellectual context of observations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

regarded with

Emphasizes the act of considering or thinking about something in a specific way.

seen with

Focuses on the visual aspect of perception and the accompanying feeling or judgment.

considered in light of

Highlights the context or factors influencing the assessment of something.

perceived with

Stresses the subjective experience and interpretation of something.

approached with

Indicates a specific attitude or method used when dealing with something.

received with

Focuses on how something is welcomed or met by others, often implying a reaction.

assessed with

Highlights the evaluation process and the criteria used in judging something.

judged with

Emphasizes the act of forming an opinion or conclusion about something.

treated with

Focuses on the manner in which something is handled or dealt with.

regarded as

Indicates how something is generally seen or considered by a group.

FAQs

How can I use "viewed with" in a sentence?

The phrase "viewed with" is used to express a particular perspective or feeling about something. For example, "The proposal was viewed with skepticism" indicates that people were doubtful about the proposal.

What are some alternatives to "viewed with"?

You can use alternatives like "regarded with", "seen with", or "perceived with" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "viewed by" instead of "viewed with"?

While "viewed by" indicates who is doing the viewing, "viewed with" specifies the feeling or perspective accompanying the view. They serve different purposes and aren't directly interchangeable.

What's the difference between "viewed with caution" and "treated with caution"?

"Viewed with caution" suggests a skeptical or wary assessment, while "treated with caution" implies careful handling or management due to potential risks. The former is about perception; the latter is about action.