viewed to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "viewed to" is not correct and usable in written English.
It seems to be a misconstruction and does not convey a clear meaning in standard English usage. Example: "The project was viewed to be a success." (This should be corrected to "viewed as a success.")

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Eisland is widely viewed to be taking steps that move her closer to running.

The New York Times

Mr. Wojtasik's video is perhaps not viewed to its best advantage here.

The New York Times

I know that a great nation is viewed to the television hoping their man is going to win".

The Guardian - Sport

The macrosystem was viewed to be consisted of educational system, and cultural factors influencing the microsystem.

Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education

The key factors, viewed to be most affected by climate change, were environmental conditions and tourism.

International Journal of Disaster Risk Science

When the load is large inductive, the load current is viewed to be constant.

Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy

Additionally, postoperative plain radiographs were viewed to check for proper disc space distraction and cage position.

Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery

All KII were purposively selected as they were viewed to have information on the study subject.

International Journal of Food Contamination

The error histogram, Fig. 5, can be viewed to obtain additional verification of network performance.

Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology

IOASs can be viewed to a certain extent as a response to these transaction costs.

Health Economics Review

Then all images obtained were manually viewed to check and refine the gender and race data.

Complex & Intelligent Systems

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "viewed as" or "considered to be" instead of the grammatically incorrect "viewed to". This ensures clarity and credibility in your writing.

Common error

Don't fall into the trap of using "viewed to" due to its superficial similarity to correct phrases. Always double-check and replace it with grammatically sound alternatives such as "viewed as" or "considered to be".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "viewed to" is intended to function as part of a passive construction, indicating how something is perceived or regarded. However, Ludwig AI highlights that this construction is grammatically incorrect. It should be replaced with "viewed as" or "considered to be."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

61%

News & Media

25%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "viewed to" appears frequently in various contexts, particularly in scientific and news-related sources, it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI flags this phrase as needing correction. Instead, it's recommended to use alternatives like "viewed as" or "considered to be" to maintain grammatical accuracy and clarity. Using grammatically sound alternatives ensures your writing remains credible and professional.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Considered to be

Replaces "viewed to" with a more grammatically sound alternative indicating judgement or assessment.

Regarded as

Substitutes "viewed to" with a phrase that emphasizes the perspective or opinion held.

Seen as

Offers a simple and direct replacement for "viewed to", focusing on perception.

Deemed to be

Replaces "viewed to" with a more formal term suggesting a formal judgement or decision.

Believed to be

Suggests that something is "viewed to" because it is held as a belief or opinion.

Perceived as

Focuses on how something is understood or sensed, rather than simply seen.

Interpreted as

Emphasizes the act of assigning meaning or significance to something.

Recognized as

Highlights the acknowledgment or acceptance of something's status or quality.

Understood to be

Suggests a general agreement or common knowledge about something.

Assumed to be

Indicates that something is "viewed to" based on an assumption, rather than certain knowledge.

FAQs

Why is "viewed to" considered grammatically incorrect?

The phrase "viewed to" is not standard English. The correct phrasing is "viewed as" or "considered to be". The word "viewed" requires a preposition like "as" to properly connect it to the complement.

What can I say instead of "viewed to"?

You can use alternatives like "considered to be", "regarded as", or "seen as" depending on the context.

Is there a specific context where "viewed to" might be acceptable?

No, "viewed to" is generally not acceptable in formal or informal writing. It's always best to use a grammatically correct alternative such as "deemed to be" or "believed to be".

What's the difference between "viewed as" and "viewed to"?

"Viewed as" is grammatically correct and means something is regarded or considered in a particular way. "Viewed to", on the other hand, is incorrect and should be replaced with a suitable alternative like "perceived as".