viewed by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "viewed by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate who has seen or examined something, often in contexts like reports, articles, or presentations. Example: "The report was viewed by several experts in the field before publication."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That was viewed by investors as progress.

The New York Times

Viewed by many.

The New Yorker

(The art can be viewed by appointment).

The New York Times - Arts

They are viewed by 400,000 visitors a year.

The New York Times

Perhaps America is not viewed by France as a threat.

The New York Times

The remaining portion can be viewed by appointment.

The Guardian - Travel

How is the President viewed by the military elite?

The New Yorker

Both are viewed by the United States as terrorist organizations.

The New York Times

Instead it's been viewed by 5 million people.

The Guardian

"Biography," he warned, "is a specter viewed by a specter".

The New York Times - Books

"Ukraine is viewed by Putin as part of Russia.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "viewed by", ensure that the subject performing the viewing is clearly identified to avoid ambiguity. For instance, specify "viewed by experts" instead of simply "viewed".

Common error

Overusing passive voice constructions like "viewed by" can make your writing sound less direct and engaging. Whenever possible, consider rephrasing to use active voice for a more impactful statement. Instead of "The presentation was viewed by the team", try "The team viewed the presentation".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "viewed by" primarily functions as a passive construction, indicating that someone or something is the recipient of an action. As supported by Ludwig's examples, it often appears in contexts where it's important to specify who or what is doing the viewing.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

34%

Science

31%

Wiki

14%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Formal & Business

6%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "viewed by" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and highlights its prevalence across varied sources, most notably in News & Media and Scientific domains. While acceptable, writers should be mindful of overusing passive voice and consider active alternatives for more directness. The frequency and consistent usage across authoritative sources underscore its validity in formal and informal communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

seen by

Simple synonym, replacing "viewed" with "seen" for brevity.

regarded by

Replaces "viewed" with "regarded", implying a more thoughtful assessment.

considered by

Similar to "regarded by", but emphasizes consideration as a process.

perceived by

Focuses on the act of perceiving or understanding something.

understood by

Highlights comprehension or grasp of something.

observed by

Emphasizes the act of watching or noticing.

witnessed by

Implies direct observation of an event or occurrence.

judged by

Highlights the act of forming an opinion or evaluation.

assessed by

Similar to "judged by", but often implies a more formal evaluation.

evaluated by

Another formal term for judging or assessing something.

FAQs

How can I use "viewed by" in a sentence?

The phrase "viewed by" is used to indicate who or what is doing the viewing or observing. For instance, you can say, "The data was viewed by the analysts", or "The artwork is viewed by thousands each year".

What's the difference between "seen by" and "viewed by"?

"Seen by" is a more general and informal term, whereas "viewed by" often implies a more deliberate or focused observation. However, they are often interchangeable depending on the context.

What can I say instead of "viewed by" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using alternatives like "regarded by", "considered by", or "assessed by", depending on the nuance you wish to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "viewed by"?

While "viewed by" is a passive construction and grammatically correct, using the active voice often leads to clearer and more direct writing. For example, instead of "The film was viewed by many", you could say "Many people viewed the film".