Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
For, a direct calculation yields (3.30). in view of assumptions,,.
In view of assumptions and (3.7), (3.8), and by Lemma 3.2, we obtain (39).
In view of assumptions that g is a Lipschitz function and α ≤ β on ( 0, 1 ), it follows that α ( 1 ) ≤ β ( 1 ).
This conception keeps two of the three basic ingredients of Prawitz-style proof-theoretic semantics (see section 2.2.2): the role of proof reduction and the substitutional view of assumptions.
In view of assumptions (F1 - F3), it readily follows that the multivalued function (Sigma(cdot,cdot):[0,1]times C [-tau,0];H)rightarrow P(L_{2}^{0})) satisfies (H2).
Therefore, in view of assumptions (2) and (3), Theorem 3.1 (see also Remark 3.1) guarantees that the elements K ij, i, j = 1,..., n - 1, of Green's matrix K t, s) of the periodic problem (3.1), (3.2) are positive and satisfy inequalities (3.14).
Similar(54)
In view of assumption (H5), we have (3.11).
In view of assumption (H2), we see that this contradicts (2.3).
In view of assumption (v), without loss of generality, let the pair ( f, T ) be absorbing and reciprocal continuous.
end{aligned} In view of assumption (3.19), the last inequality implies that (mathcal{H}_{2}) is a contraction.
In view of assumption (e′1), firstly we assume that g ( X ) is complete, then there exists u ∈ X such that lim n → ∞ g ( x n ) = g ( u ).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com