Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
The dose response curve of cervical trachea vibration significantly differed from the femoral muscle vibration (p <0.05).
The average RMS ratio was significantly different on non-vibration trials than on the passive driven arm vibration trials (p = 0.016) and active vibration (p = 0.003) conditions.
The protein level of PPAR γ in HFD rats, which was key factor of adipose cell differentiation, was lower than that in control group due to vibration (P < 0.01) and 4(b)).
The cough reflex threshold during chest wall vibration (1.34 ± 0.07 [SE] g/L) was significantly greater than those during sham application (p <0.01) and femoral muscle vibration (p <0.01).
In their pioneering cross-linguistic study of word initial plosives, Lisker and Abramson (1964) defined voice onset time (VOT) as "the time interval between the burst that marks the release of the stop closure and the onset of quasiperiodicity that reflects the laryngeal vibration" (p. 422).
Similar(55)
Furthermore, these patients had higher vibration threshold (p < 0.001) and lower heart rate variation (p = 0.024).
In Eq. (1), a refractive index ratio is ∼ 0.97 [6], and the main intramolecular vibration E p is dominated by C=C symmetric stretch at 0.18 eV [21].
The mean primary and repeat test scores did not differ (3.8 ± 2.7 vs. 3.9 ± 2.8 vibration units, P = 0.38).
The absorptions at 687 and 670 cm-1 are attributed to the stretching vibrations of P = S group, while the absorption at 582 cm-1 is attributed to the stretching vibrations of P-S group.
The absorption peaks at 1147, 1035, and 928 cm−1 are the P-O stretching vibration bands of P-O, and 565 cm−1 is bending vibration band of P-O, which is characteristic bands of PO4 3− ions.
As expected, patients with carpal tunnel syndrome also had significantly elevated mechanical detection and vibration detection thresholds (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.007 respectively) indicative of Aβ fibre involvement (Fig. 1A).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com