Sentence examples for viability of a process from inspiring English sources

Energy consumption, product water costs and technology reliability are key parameters that determine the viability of a process.

However, due to the high costs of pyridine cofactors, an efficient cofactor regeneration system is a prerequisite for the commercial viability of a process [5] [6].

The viability of a commercial process is highly dependent on overall process yield.

We have evaluated the viability of a photocatalytic process for bacteria inactivation with sunlight, affordable 0.8 m2 compound parabolic collectors (CPC) and an UV vis absorbing ruthenium (II) tris chelate complex immobilised (2 g m−2) onto porous silicone as singlet molecular oxygen generator.

Policy recommendations regarding changes to resource allocation models and the viability of a national evaluation process for predictive genetic tests were also examined.

To demonstrate the viability of this process, a synthetic wastewater was designed to represent the sort of effluent that often results from the speciality organic chemicals sector.

The recovery rate proved to be a relevant parameter of influence in the economic viability of the process, as an increase of 20% produced an improvement of 48.6% in the net present value estimated.

In addition to these results, the presence of bayerite and gibbsite in the powder diffraction patterns also shows a promise as these phases could add a viability of the process to the market and also exhibits its recycling potential for aluminium dross.

These large-scale experiments, although necessary to demonstrate the commercial viability of the process, require a great deal of time and effort.

This paper demonstrates the viability of a group-Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) as a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) technique for managing fire design stakeholder opinions on economic, safety, environmental and societal considerations toward selecting suitable fire protection for steel structures.

These fermentations used reduced inoculum sizes and had shortened process times, thereby improving the overall economic viability of a pine-to-ethanol conversion process.