Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
When discrepancy was found between sample readings, a consensus was achieved via third pathologist simultaneous examination using double-headed microscope.
Similar(58)
But this was contradicted by a second and third pathologist, the inquest heard.
In eight of 12 cases of moderate marked LPE there was disparity in diagnosis by two pathologists regarding differentiation from LGAL, requiring assessment by a third pathologist to reach a consensus diagnosis.
A third pathologist was consulted if the previous two pathologists made different diagnosis.
Consensus was achieved with a third pathologist in discordant cases.
A third pathologist (EM) participated in IF staining and evaluation.
A third pathologist (JCR) participated in IF staining and evaluation.
The CHANCE TMA and the YNOCC TMA were read by two pathologists (KF and LT, respectively), with any indeterminate scores evaluated by a third pathologist (WF).
If an inconsistency occurred, a third pathologist was consulted to achieve consensus.
A third pathologist was invited when the discordance was present between them.
She sent some specimens to a second pathologist in the U.S., and, once again, the pathologist had no idea what was wrong.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com