veteran of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "veteran of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to someone who has experience in a particular field or activity. For example, "The new coach is a veteran of the National League."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

Veteran of WWII.

The New York Times

Veteran of WWll.

The New York Times

Veteran of the Korean War.

The New York Times

Decorated war veteran of WWII.

The New York Times

Army veteran of Korean War.

The New York Times

Veteran of World War II.

The New York Times

He is a veteran of those battles.

The New York Times

WWII veteran of the Battle of Anzio.

The New York Times

He was an Army veteran of WWII.

The New York Times

Wallace was the veteran of the group.

The New Yorker

Insurance in 1950 and veteran of WWII.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "veteran of", ensure you clearly specify the field or activity in which the person has experience. For instance, say "veteran of the Iraq War" or "veteran of the banking industry" for clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "veteran of" without specifying the area of expertise. Saying someone is simply a "veteran" can be ambiguous. Always provide context to clarify their experience.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "veteran of" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun, indicating extensive experience or service in a particular area. As Ludwig AI confirms, this is a valid and commonly used English phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

77%

Formal & Business

10%

Science

5%

Less common in

Academia

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "veteran of" is a commonly used and grammatically correct phrase to indicate that someone has considerable experience in a particular field or activity. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is valid and widely used in English. It appears most frequently in news and media contexts, often describing individuals with long careers or service in specific areas like the military or business. To use it effectively, always specify the area of expertise and avoid vagueness. Alternatives like "experienced in" or "seasoned in" can be used depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

experienced in

Focuses on the experience gained in a specific area.

seasoned in

Emphasizes extensive experience and expertise.

long-time participant in

Highlights prolonged involvement in an activity.

expert in

Indicates a high level of skill and knowledge.

adept at

Suggests skill and proficiency.

knowledgeable about

Emphasizes familiarity and understanding.

well-versed in

Indicates thorough knowledge and experience.

proficient in

Highlights competence and skill.

practiced in

Focuses on the experience gained through practice.

old hand at

Informal way to describe someone with a lot of experience.

FAQs

How can I use "veteran of" in a sentence?

Use "veteran of" to describe someone with considerable experience in a particular field or activity. For example, "He is a "veteran of Wall Street"" or "She is a "veteran of the stage"".

What are some alternatives to "veteran of"?

Depending on the context, you can use phrases like "experienced in", "seasoned in", or "expert in".

Is it correct to say someone is a "veteran at" something?

While not grammatically incorrect, "veteran of" is the more common and idiomatic way to express someone's experience. Using "veteran at" might sound slightly awkward.

What's the difference between "veteran of" and "novice in"?

"Veteran of" describes someone with a lot of experience, while "novice in" describes someone who is new and inexperienced. They are antonyms, representing opposite levels of expertise.