very weaker

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "very weaker" is not correct in English.
The correct form would be "much weaker" or simply "weaker." Example: "After the last round of tests, the results showed that the new model is much weaker than the previous one."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Among the reported studies, the extract of one Turkish bee-pollen has been reported to possess strong antibacterial activity against plant pathogenic bacteria [29] and a very weaker one against food-related microorganisms [30].

Chemistry Central Journal

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

"Very weak.

The New Yorker

"He was very weak, very weak inside.

Independent

Osborne was very, very weak.

The Guardian

Partisanship was very weak.

The Guardian - Opinion

People were very weak".

The Guardian

I'm very weak.

The Guardian

She is very weak.

The Guardian

Your economy get very weak.

The New York Times

He said, "You're very weak.

The New Yorker

"This bill is very weak".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using double comparatives like "very weaker". Opt for "much weaker", "significantly weaker", or simply "weaker" to express a lesser degree of strength or effectiveness.

Common error

The phrase "very weaker" attempts to intensify a comparative adjective, but it's grammatically incorrect. Instead of using "very" with a comparative, use intensifiers like "much", "far", or "significantly" before the adjective. For instance, say "much weaker" instead of "very weaker".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "very weaker" functions as an adjective phrase intended to modify a noun by indicating a lesser degree of strength or effectiveness. However, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect, advising against its use in formal writing.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "very weaker" is used to express a reduced degree of strength or effectiveness. However, Ludwig AI indicates that it is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided. More appropriate alternatives include "much weaker" or "significantly weaker". While the phrase may appear in informal contexts, authoritative sources do not support its use, especially in formal or professional writing. Due to its grammatical issues, it's best to opt for grammatically sound alternatives to convey your intended meaning clearly and effectively. According to Ludwig the correct form would be “much weaker” or simply “weaker.”

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

significantly weaker

Emphasizes a more substantial difference in weakness.

much weaker

A more grammatically correct and common way to express a greater degree of weakness.

considerably weaker

Highlights a noticeable and significant difference in strength.

noticeably weaker

Indicates that the weakness is easily observed or detected.

appreciably weaker

Suggests that the weakness is large enough to be important or significant.

distinctly weaker

Emphasizes a clear and easily identifiable difference in weakness.

markedly weaker

Highlights a clearly evident and noticeable difference in strength.

substantially weaker

Indicates a significant and considerable degree of weakness.

far weaker

Emphasizes a large difference in strength or effectiveness.

somewhat weaker

Indicates a slight or moderate degree of weakness.

FAQs

Is "very weaker" grammatically correct?

No, "very weaker" is not grammatically correct. The correct way to express a lesser degree of strength is to use "much weaker" or simply "weaker".

What are some alternatives to "very weaker"?

You can use alternatives like "much weaker", "significantly weaker", or "considerably weaker".

Why is "very weaker" considered incorrect?

The phrase "very weaker" is incorrect because it uses "very" to modify a comparative adjective. Comparative adjectives like "weaker" already imply a degree of difference, so using "very" is redundant and grammatically unsound.

How can I use "weaker" correctly in a sentence?

You can use "weaker" correctly by saying something is "weaker than" something else. For example, "This argument is "weaker than" the previous one" or "The economy is "getting weaker"".