Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
We start with a 2.5-dimensional force-free current sheet under a uniformly distributed resistivity, which is subject to a very small random velocity perturbation.
In terms of identifying patients for engagement, random sampling is the least biased way although considering that the number of patients chosen for engagement is very small, random sampling can fail.
Similar(58)
where α is a parameter within the range [0,1] that determines the degree of amplification, δ is a small positive constant that avoids the weighting factor becoming infinitely large as N[k]→0, and ε is a very small positive random variable such that the magnitude spectra of detected non-speech frames are significantly reduced.
Because the number of included studies was very small, a random pilot test was not feasible.
This is not surprising since in some cases the coefficients of the linear combination may be very small (due to the random draw of these coefficients in these experiments) which makes the detection very challenging.
The same procedure applies when Simulations showed that the probability of having such an arrangement was very small (P ~10-4) forandomom normal variates.
Many studies into educational programs for nursing staff in long term care settings have very small sample sizes, non random designs, designs without control groups or a low response rate [ 13, 14].
We observed very small differences in fixed and random effects combined estimates.
The probability that the identified SF cluster is random is very small.
This cluster has a very small likelihood of being a random event (Expert Panel 2004), and Fallon has been declared "one of the most unique clusters of childhood cancer ever reported" (Steinmaus et al. 2004).
However, the theory developed for the technique is asymptotic, and its performance can be less than optimal with very small sample sizes (due to random sampling of matched array pairs with replacement causing an excessive number of ties in some samples).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com