Sentence examples for very limited differences from inspiring English sources
On the contrary, there are only very limited differences among farms with different PSE levels.
This sequence is identical to many sequences generated from European H. repandum, and shows very limited differences from the sequence generated from root tips of Pinus muricata (GU180269, from California) (Fig. 1).
Our supervised clustering analysis showed the existence of very limited differences in gene expression profiles and in signaling pathways between UCs from the two locations, although CLCA2 and GABRE may hold promise as differential markers.
Our conclusion is that lines, A17, J5 and J6 can be considered as having an identical genotype, even if very limited differences in nucleotide sequence cannot be ruled out.
Because there were very limited differences in inbreeding depression among populations, our data cannot really be used to test the third prediction, that mating history, through its effect on population genetic load, should affect the opportunity for pollen competition to reduce the cost of inbreeding.
The little effect of fibre embedded length on bond properties is due to very limited difference in length and significant mechanical anchorage associated with hooked end. 3.
The little effect of fibre embedded length on bond properties is due to very limited difference in length and significant mechanical anchorage associated with hooked end.
Therefore while VP64 may be a better transcriptional activator than VP16, this results in a very limited difference in potency in vivo.
Given the very limited genomic differences we have detected between wMelCS and wMelPop, we also wished to confirm that the phenotypic differences between wMelCS and wMelPop are due solely to Wolbachia, and not to host effects.
As there are very limited morphological differences between the extant wild and domestic bactrian camels, the relationship between the groups was proposed as subspecific (Reading et al. 2002).
Masking the analysis with the region of interest revealed very limited group differences in the region of interest; the control group only had higher BOLD in the primary somatosensory cortex; the patient group in the secondary somatosensory cortex (both Punc < 0.001, T = 3.14; qfdr < 0.05) (Fig. 3D and Table 3).
