Suggestions(3)
Exact(8)
Hence, the effects of torsional coupling are very less for the system installed with RSASDs as compared to PSDs. 4.
Hence, the effects of torsional coupling are very less for the system installed with RSASDs as compared to PSDs.
This is because the false negatives are very less for both the systems and the false positives are high compared to false negatives.
The false negatives and false positives are very less for acknowledgement system when compared to that of the message-delivery based system.
The relative difference of positive and negative half cycle frequencies is very less for single layer orthotropic shells, and it is significant for cross-ply shells for axisymmetric mode of vibration.
Further, the difference between the control forces of dampers for asymmetric systems as compared to those of corresponding symmetric systems is very less for the systems installed with semi-active dampers, whereas the difference is significant for systems installed with passive dampers.
Similar(52)
There are several advantages for single enantiomer products when compared to their racemates like more selective and comparatively simple pharmacodynamic as well as pharmacokinetic profile, potential for an improved therapeutic index and very less probability for complex drug interactions [1].
It provides very less probability for instrumental error and does not require a series of standards for calculation of an unknown and also do not require expensive equipment.
Medium 7H9/ADC/Tween was found to be very less effective for in vitro antitubercular activity of all the benzimidazole derivatives.
However, it seems that there is a very less chance for the interference of phosphate ion on the assay system as no difference was observed in TCA treated and untreated positive controls, that is, pure H2O2 samples, because, in TCA treated pure H2O2 samples, high concentrations of phosphate ions would be there since 6 M K2HPO4 was used to neutralize it.
The consumption of oxygen in EB dehydrogenation is very less (0.5 mol for a mole of EB).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com